Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-05-05 Thread Yu, Zhang
Thank you, Wei. On 5/5/2015 5:12 PM, Wei Liu wrote: On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 08:51:56PM +0800, Yu, Zhang wrote: Hi Wei, Thanks for your reply. On 5/4/2015 5:44 PM, Wei Liu wrote: (Thanks for trimming the CC list before hand) On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 02:05:49PM +0800, Yu, Zhang wrote: Hi Wei,

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-05-05 Thread Wei Liu
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 08:51:56PM +0800, Yu, Zhang wrote: > Hi Wei, > > Thanks for your reply. > > On 5/4/2015 5:44 PM, Wei Liu wrote: > >(Thanks for trimming the CC list before hand) > > > >On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 02:05:49PM +0800, Yu, Zhang wrote: > >>Hi Wei, > >> > > > >Hello. > > > >> This

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-05-04 Thread Yu, Zhang
Hi Wei, Thanks for your reply. On 5/4/2015 5:44 PM, Wei Liu wrote: (Thanks for trimming the CC list before hand) On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 02:05:49PM +0800, Yu, Zhang wrote: Hi Wei, Hello. This is Zhang Yu from Intel graphic virtualization team. Previously in Xen hackathon, Paul and I m

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-05-04 Thread Wei Liu
Hi Fabio Discussion on a particular bug should be in a separate thread. This thread is mainly for Xen 4.6 release. Wei. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-05-04 Thread Wei Liu
(Thanks for trimming the CC list before hand) On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 02:05:49PM +0800, Yu, Zhang wrote: > Hi Wei, > Hello. > This is Zhang Yu from Intel graphic virtualization team. Previously in Xen > hackathon, Paul and I mentioned that there're several patch series for XenGT > that need t

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-05-03 Thread Yu, Zhang
Hi Wei, This is Zhang Yu from Intel graphic virtualization team. Previously in Xen hackathon, Paul and I mentioned that there're several patch series for XenGT that need to be tracked on Xen 4.6. Here, I'd like to confirm with you about these patchsets: 1> 16-byte MMIO emulation fix – ow

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-05-01 Thread Jim Fehlig
Fabio Fantoni wrote: > 2015-04-30 18:55 GMT+02:00 Jim Fehlig >: > > Fabio Fantoni wrote: > > Il 29/04/2015 18:39, Jim Fehlig ha scritto: > > linux-tyb8:~/ # dmesg | grep -i qxl > [4.901158] [drm] qxl: 16M of VRAM memory size > [4.901159] [drm] q

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-05-01 Thread Fabio Fantoni
2015-04-30 18:55 GMT+02:00 Jim Fehlig : > Fabio Fantoni wrote: > > Il 29/04/2015 18:39, Jim Fehlig ha scritto: > >> dom0 and domU are both SLES12. Xen is fairly recent xen-unstable plus a > >> few libxl patches. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Jim > >> > > > > But the domU was without qxl driver installe

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-30 Thread Jim Fehlig
Fabio Fantoni wrote: > Il 29/04/2015 18:39, Jim Fehlig ha scritto: >> dom0 and domU are both SLES12. Xen is fairly recent xen-unstable plus a >> few libxl patches. >> >> Regards, >> Jim >> > > But the domU was without qxl driver installed? No, it was installed: linux-tyb8:~/ # dmesg | grep -i qx

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-30 Thread Fabio Fantoni
Il 29/04/2015 18:39, Jim Fehlig ha scritto: Fabio Fantoni wrote: Il 29/04/2015 02:21, Andrew Cooper ha scritto: On 28/04/15 23:17, Jim Fehlig wrote: Jim Fehlig wrote: wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: Hi all We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep track of all

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-29 Thread Jim Fehlig
Fabio Fantoni wrote: > Il 29/04/2015 02:21, Andrew Cooper ha scritto: >> On 28/04/15 23:17, Jim Fehlig wrote: >>> Jim Fehlig wrote: wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > Hi all > > We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an > email to keep > track of all the pat

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-29 Thread Fabio Fantoni
Il 29/04/2015 12:23, Fabio Fantoni ha scritto: Il 29/04/2015 02:21, Andrew Cooper ha scritto: On 28/04/15 23:17, Jim Fehlig wrote: Jim Fehlig wrote: wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: Hi all We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep track of all the patch series

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-29 Thread Fabio Fantoni
Il 29/04/2015 02:21, Andrew Cooper ha scritto: On 28/04/15 23:17, Jim Fehlig wrote: Jim Fehlig wrote: wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: Hi all We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / or

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-29 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 28/04/15 23:17, Jim Fehlig wrote: Jim Fehlig wrote: wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: Hi all We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / or acurate. Feel free to reply this email with n

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-28 Thread Jim Fehlig
Jim Fehlig wrote: > wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep >> track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / or >> acurate. Feel free to reply this email with new projects or correct m

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-28 Thread Jim Fehlig
wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > Hi all > > We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep > track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / or > acurate. Feel free to reply this email with new projects or correct my > misunderstanding. > [.

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-15 Thread Lars Kurth
> On 15 Apr 2015, at 10:18, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >> Should we also ask people to trim the CC list to just those interested >> in the quoted stuff? Or do people think that erring on the side of not >> trimming too many people? >> >> People might also to consider changing the subject, e.g. "Stat

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-15 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 15.04.15 at 11:11, wrote: > On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 14:52 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:48:06PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >> > >>> On 14.04.15 at 15:35, wrote: >> > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:27 PM, wrote: >> > >> > Tamas (and others not doing so) - please trim your

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-15 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 14:52 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:48:06PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > > >>> On 14.04.15 at 15:35, wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:27 PM, wrote: > > > > Tamas (and others not doing so) - please trim your quotes in replies. > > > > Wei - could

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-15 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 11:37 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:34:45PM +0300, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > > On 04/14/2015 01:27 PM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > > * VM event patches (none) > > >Add support for XSETBV vm_events, > > >Support hybernating guests > > >Suppor

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-14 Thread Chun Yan Liu
>>> On 4/14/2015 at 09:33 PM, in message <552d1718.8060...@eu.citrix.com>, >>> George Dunlap wrote: > On 04/14/2015 11:27 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > == Hypervisor == > > > > * Alternate p2m: support multiple copies of host p2m (ok) > > - Ed White > > > > * Improve RTDS sc

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-14 Thread Elena Ufimtseva
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:33:23PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:28:29PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > On 14/04/15 11:27, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > > === Hypervisor X86 === > > > > > > * VT-d Posted-interrupt (PI) (none) > > > - Wu, Feng > > > > V1 posted > > > >

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-14 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> * Regression in PCI passthrough of INTx legacy devices can trigger list > corruption (good) >Sander reported it. Two different types of patches available. > - Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Done. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-14 Thread Jaggi, Manish
From: Ian Campbell Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 7:56 PM To: Julien Grall Cc: Jaggi, Manish; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder) On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 13:34 +0100, Julien Grall wrote

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-14 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 13:34 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Manish, > > On 14/04/15 13:25, Jaggi, Manish wrote: > > * ARM PCI passthrough (none) > > - Manish Jaggi > > - Vijay Kilari > > [manish] I have started pushing the patches > > Finding the "[manish]" in the mail was like finding a

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-14 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 04/14/2015 06:27 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: * Display IO topology when PXM data is available (good) v3 posted - Boris Ostrovsky I should have v7 in the next day or so. * VPMU - 'perf' support in Xen (good) v14 posted Need reviews/final ack. - Boris Ostrovsky Ne

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-14 Thread Meng Xu
2015-04-14 9:33 GMT-04:00 George Dunlap : > On 04/14/2015 11:27 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > == Hypervisor == > > > > * Alternate p2m: support multiple copies of host p2m (ok) > > - Ed White > > > > * Improve RTDS scheduler (none) > > - Dagaen Golomb, Meng Xu > > This is a little vag

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-14 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:48:06PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 14.04.15 at 15:35, wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:27 PM, wrote: > > Tamas (and others not doing so) - please trim your quotes in replies. > > Wei - could you add a sentence saying so near the top of future mails > you

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-14 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:28:29PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 14/04/15 11:27, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > === Hypervisor X86 === > > > > * VT-d Posted-interrupt (PI) (none) > > - Wu, Feng > > V1 posted > > > * Intel PML (Page Modification Logging) for Xen (none) > >design doc p

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-14 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 14/04/15 11:27, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > === Hypervisor X86 === > > * VT-d Posted-interrupt (PI) (none) > - Wu, Feng V1 posted > * Intel PML (Page Modification Logging) for Xen (none) >design doc posted > - Kai Huang V1 posted (good) > > * PVH - AMD hardware support. (fair)

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-14 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 14.04.15 at 15:35, wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:27 PM, wrote: Tamas (and others not doing so) - please trim your quotes in replies. Wei - could you add a sentence saying so near the top of future mails you send in this regard? Jan ___

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-14 Thread Tamas Lengyel
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:27 PM, wrote: > Hi all > > We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to > keep > track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / > or > acurate. Feel free to reply this email with new projects or correct my > misund

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-14 Thread George Dunlap
On 04/14/2015 11:27 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > == Hypervisor == > > * Alternate p2m: support multiple copies of host p2m (ok) > - Ed White > > * Improve RTDS scheduler (none) > - Dagaen Golomb, Meng Xu This is a little vague... exactly what kinds of improvements are envisioned her

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-14 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Manish, On 14/04/15 13:25, Jaggi, Manish wrote: > * ARM PCI passthrough (none) > - Manish Jaggi > - Vijay Kilari > [manish] I have started pushing the patches Finding the "[manish]" in the mail was like finding a needle in a haystack. And I knew that you were using this tag... Please

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-14 Thread Jaggi, Manish
; ard.biesheu...@linaro.org; quan...@intel.com; oleksandr.tyshche...@globallogic.com Subject: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder) Hi all We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-14 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:34:45PM +0300, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > On 04/14/2015 01:27 PM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > > * VM event patches (none) > >Add support for XSETBV vm_events, > >Support hybernating guests > >Support for VMCALL-based vm_events > > - Razvan Cojocaru > > The

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-14 Thread Razvan Cojocaru
On 04/14/2015 01:27 PM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > * VM event patches (none) >Add support for XSETBV vm_events, >Support hybernating guests >Support for VMCALL-based vm_events > - Razvan Cojocaru These depend on Tamas' Clean-up of mem-event subsystem series (which hasn't been app

[Xen-devel] Xen 4.6 Development Update (three months reminder)

2015-04-14 Thread wei.liu2
Hi all We are now three months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / or acurate. Feel free to reply this email with new projects or correct my misunderstanding. = Timeline = We are planning on a 9-month re