>>> On 23.06.15 at 11:45, wrote:
> We seem to have gone off list -- not on purpose I think?
No, sorry - when I trimmed the Cc list I trimmed it a little too much.
Re-added.
Jan
> On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 10:20 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 23.06.15 at 11:16, wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 02:53:54PM +0100, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
[...]
> * Xen multiboot2-EFI support (ok)
>See http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg03962.html
> http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg03982.html
> - Daniel Kiper
Last week I alm
> -Original Message-
> > * Intel GVT-g (none)
> > requires refactoring ioreq-server, fixing 16-byte MMIO emulation
> > and optional PV IOMMU support
> >- Yu, Zhang
> ioreq-server: still in development. Previously tried to refactor the
> ioreq-server to track the IO resources b
On 6/5/2015 9:53 PM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
(Note, please trim your quotes when replying, and also trim the CC list if
necessary. You might also consider changing the subject line of your reply to
"Status of (Was: Xen 4.6 Development Update (X months reminder)")
Hi all
We are now four mo
> From: Boris Ostrovsky [mailto:boris.ostrov...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 10:28 PM
>
> On 06/05/2015 09:53 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
> >
> > * VPMU - 'perf' support in Xen (good)
> > v21 posted
> > Need reviews/final ack.
> >- Boris Ostrovsky
>
> I posted a vers
On 06/05/2015 09:53 PM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
(Note, please trim your quotes when replying, and also trim the CC list if
necessary. You might also consider changing the subject line of your reply to
"Status of (Was: Xen 4.6 Development Update (X months reminder)")
Hi all
We are now four m
> -Original Message-
> From: wei.l...@citrix.com [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 9:54 PM
> To: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org; White, Edmund H;
> xumengpa...@gmail.com; dgol...@seas.upenn.edu; lichong...@gmail.com;
> jtwea...@hawaii.edu; oleksandr.dmytrys...@glo
>>> On 05.06.15 at 16:28, wrote:
> On 06/05/2015 09:53 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
>>
>> * VPMU - 'perf' support in Xen (good)
>> v21 posted
>> Need reviews/final ack.
>>- Boris Ostrovsky
>
> I posted a version last week with very few changes. Besides Jan's review
> I think it n
On 05/06/15 15:28, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
>
>>
>> == Deferred ==
>>
>>
>> * IO-NUMA - hwloc and xl (none)
>> Andrew Cooper had an RFC patch for hwloc
>> add restrictions as to which devices cannot safely/functionally
>> be split apart.
>>- Boris Ostrovsky
>>
>
> I don't have any im
Hi Wei,
On 05/06/15 14:53, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
> === Hypervisor ARM ===
> * ARM GICv2 on GICv3 support (none)
(fair)
> - Julien Grall
> - Vijay Kilari
I'm the only one working on it...
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
___
Xen-devel mailing
On 06/05/2015 09:53 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
* VPMU - 'perf' support in Xen (good)
v21 posted
Need reviews/final ack.
- Boris Ostrovsky
I posted a version last week with very few changes. Besides Jan's review
I think it needs Intel's ACK on a few patches that touched VMX (K
(Note, please trim your quotes when replying, and also trim the CC list if
necessary. You might also consider changing the subject line of your reply to
"Status of (Was: Xen 4.6 Development Update (X months reminder)")
Hi all
We are now four months into 4.6 development window. This is an email t
12 matches
Mail list logo
