On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 18:39 +0300, Vitaly Chernooky wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Dario Faggioli
> wrote:
> Actually, we don't even have mutexes _within_ the hypervisor,
> so I
> struggle a bit to figure out how it would be useful to offer a
> similar
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Dario Faggioli
wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 12:48 +0300, Vitaly Chernooky wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> Hi,
> >
> > I have theoretical question.
> >
> Great, I love theoretical stuff! :-P
> >
> > What do you think about porting futexes or binder to XEN?
> >
> Ouch...
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 12:48 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> [0] http://www.akkadia.org/drepper/futex.pdf
>
And, BTW, this is an (old, but) nice reading as well, about futees:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/ols/2002/ols2002-pages-479-495.pdf
Dario
--
<> (Raistlin Majere)
-
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 12:48 +0300, Vitaly Chernooky wrote:
> Hi all!
>
Hi,
>
> I have theoretical question.
>
Great, I love theoretical stuff! :-P
>
> What do you think about porting futexes or binder to XEN?
>
Ouch... That's *too* theoretical! :-)
No, really, I know a bit about futexes [0], whi
Hi all!
I have theoretical question.
What do you think about porting futexes or binder to XEN?
With best regards,
--
*Vitaly Chernooky | Senior Developer - Product Engineering and Development*
GlobalLogic
P *+380.44.4929695 ext.1136* M *+380.63.6011802* S cvv_2k
www.globallogic.com
http://www
