On 02/03/17 19:33, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> I expect it might have something to do with fact that this failure to
>> boot is a 6-core system, rather than a power of two, at which point I
>> doubt the APIC IDs follow a linear trend.
>>
>> (Properly fixing the reported topology is going to be a can
On 02/03/17 19:28, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 02/03/17 20:17, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 02/03/17 19:15, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> On 03/02/2017 01:56 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 02/03/17 18:51, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 02/03/17 19:29, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 02/03/17 18:
> I expect it might have something to do with fact that this failure to
> boot is a 6-core system, rather than a power of two, at which point I
> doubt the APIC IDs follow a linear trend.
>
> (Properly fixing the reported topology is going to be a can of worms.
> All this series is trying to do i
On 02/03/17 20:17, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 02/03/17 19:15, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 03/02/2017 01:56 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 02/03/17 18:51, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
On 02/03/17 19:29, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 02/03/17 18:25, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 02/03/17 18:
On 02/03/17 19:15, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 03/02/2017 01:56 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 02/03/17 18:51, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> On 02/03/17 19:29, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 02/03/17 18:25, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 02/03/17 18:38, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 02/03/17 17:
On 03/02/2017 01:56 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 02/03/17 18:51, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 02/03/17 19:29, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 02/03/17 18:25, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
On 02/03/17 18:38, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 02/03/17 17:29, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 02/03/17
On 02/03/17 18:51, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 02/03/17 19:29, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 02/03/17 18:25, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> On 02/03/17 18:38, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 02/03/17 17:29, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 02/03/17 15:55, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 02/03/17 14:42
On 02/03/17 19:29, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 02/03/17 18:25, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 02/03/17 18:38, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 02/03/17 17:29, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
On 02/03/17 15:55, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 02/03/17 14:42, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> Hi Andrew / Jan,
On 02/03/17 18:25, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 02/03/17 18:38, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 02/03/17 17:29, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> On 02/03/17 15:55, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 02/03/17 14:42, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Hi Andrew / Jan,
>
> While testing current xen-unstable
On 02/03/17 18:38, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 02/03/17 17:29, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 02/03/17 15:55, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 02/03/17 14:42, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
Hi Andrew / Jan,
While testing current xen-unstable staging i ran into my host rebooting in
early k
On 02/03/17 17:29, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 02/03/17 15:55, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 02/03/17 14:42, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> Hi Andrew / Jan,
>>>
>>> While testing current xen-unstable staging i ran into my host rebooting in
>>> early kernel boot.
>>> Bisection has turned up:
>>>
On 02/03/17 15:55, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 02/03/17 14:42, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> Hi Andrew / Jan,
>>
>> While testing current xen-unstable staging i ran into my host rebooting in
>> early kernel boot.
>> Bisection has turned up:
>> 5cecf60f439e828f4bc0d2a368ced9a73b130cb7 is the firs
On 02/03/17 14:42, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Hi Andrew / Jan,
>
> While testing current xen-unstable staging i ran into my host rebooting in
> early kernel boot.
> Bisection has turned up:
> 5cecf60f439e828f4bc0d2a368ced9a73b130cb7 is the first bad commit
> Author: Andrew Cooper
>
Hi Andrew / Jan,
While testing current xen-unstable staging i ran into my host rebooting in
early kernel boot.
Bisection has turned up:
5cecf60f439e828f4bc0d2a368ced9a73b130cb7 is the first bad commit
Author: Andrew Cooper
Date: Fri Feb 17 17:10:50 2017 +
x86/cpuid: Handl
14 matches
Mail list logo
