On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 21:20 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 01:18 -070
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 21:20 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 01:18 -0700, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > > > On 23 September
On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 01:18 -0700, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > > On 23 September 2015 at 01:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > > > > > On 23.09.15 at 02:49
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 01:18 -0700, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > On 23 September 2015 at 01:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > > > > On 23.09.15 at 02:49, wrote:
> > > > > Regarding Runtime Services, the EFI s
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 01:18 -0700, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On 23 September 2015 at 01:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > > > On 23.09.15 at 02:49, wrote:
> > > > Regarding Runtime Services, the EFI spec doesn't allow a NULL pointer
> > > > to
> > > > the R
On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 01:18 -0700, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 23 September 2015 at 01:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > > On 23.09.15 at 02:49, wrote:
> > > Regarding Runtime Services, the EFI spec doesn't allow a NULL pointer
> > > to
> > > the Runtime Services table, so Mark would like to see a pr
On 23 September 2015 at 01:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.09.15 at 02:49, wrote:
>> Regarding Runtime Services, the EFI spec doesn't allow a NULL pointer to
>> the Runtime Services table, so Mark would like to see a proper pointer
>> being passed there. The function table could be populated w
>>> On 23.09.15 at 02:49, wrote:
> Regarding Runtime Services, the EFI spec doesn't allow a NULL pointer to
> the Runtime Services table, so Mark would like to see a proper pointer
> being passed there. The function table could be populated with
> hypercall wrappers in assembly, keeping the same
Hi all,
Mark, Ard and I have just had a discussion on ACPI, EFI and booting
interfaces for Xen and kexec.
We all agree that the most important thing to do is to document
precisely what this interface looks like. Not just the device tree
nodes, but also who calls ExitBootServices, SetVirtualAddres
