On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:51:34AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> And I'm afraid there's yet one more issue: If my reading of the
> >> >> SDM is right, then the offsets at which components get saved
> >> >> by XSAVEC / XSAVES aren't fixed, but depend on RFBM (as that's
> >> >> what gets stored i
>>> On 04.02.16 at 07:49, wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 02:42:38AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> > With this another question then is whether, when both XSAVEC
>> >> > and XSAVEOPT are available, it is indeed always better to use
>> >> > XSAVEC (as the code is doing after your enabling).
>> >
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 02:42:38AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> > With this another question then is whether, when both XSAVEC
> >> > and XSAVEOPT are available, it is indeed always better to use
> >> > XSAVEC (as the code is doing after your enabling).
> > Yes.
> > But current no machine only su
>>> On 02.02.16 at 07:31, wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 08:12:20AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 26.01.16 at 15:33, wrote:
>> > originally I only meant to inquire about the state of the promised
>> > alternatives improvement to the XSAVE code. However, while
>> > looking over the code in
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 08:12:20AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 26.01.16 at 15:33, wrote:
> > originally I only meant to inquire about the state of the promised
> > alternatives improvement to the XSAVE code. However, while
> > looking over the code in question again I stumbled across a
> >
>>> On 26.01.16 at 15:33, wrote:
> originally I only meant to inquire about the state of the promised
> alternatives improvement to the XSAVE code. However, while
> looking over the code in question again I stumbled across a
> separate issue: XSAVES, just like XSAVEOPT, may use the
> "modified" op
Shuai,
originally I only meant to inquire about the state of the promised
alternatives improvement to the XSAVE code. However, while
looking over the code in question again I stumbled across a
separate issue: XSAVES, just like XSAVEOPT, may use the
"modified" optimization. However, the fcs and fds
