> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 1, 2016 8:31 PM
> To: Wang, Yong Y ; Wu, Feng
> Cc: Nakajima, Jun ; Jan Beulich
> (jbeul...@suse.com) ; xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> Subject: Re: SMAP/SMEP issues with 32-bit pv guests
>
>
On 01/08/16 13:24, Wang, Yong Y wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Monday, August 1, 2016 6:16 PM
>> To: Wu, Feng
>> Cc: Nakajima, Jun ; Wang, Yong Y
>> ; Jan Beulich (jbeul...@suse.com)
>> ; xen-devel@lists.xen.org
>> Subject: R
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 1, 2016 6:16 PM
> To: Wu, Feng
> Cc: Nakajima, Jun ; Wang, Yong Y
> ; Jan Beulich (jbeul...@suse.com)
> ; xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> Subject: Re: SMAP/SMEP issues with 32-bit pv guests
>
>
On 28/06/16 02:58, Wu, Feng wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> As you know, SMAP/SMEP may affect the 32-bit pv guests, after discussed
> internally, our current idea is that we can just disable this two feature for
> Xen hypervisor itself, hence only enable it for HVM guests. Do you think this
> is acceptabl
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 1, 2016 4:16 PM
> To: Wu, Feng
> Cc: Andrew Cooper(andrew.coop...@citrix.com)
> ; Nakajima, Jun ;
> Wang, Yong Y ; xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> Subject: RE: SMAP/SMEP issues with 32-bit pv guests
>
>
>>> On 01.08.16 at 02:48, wrote:
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 3:42 PM
>> >>> On 28.06.16 at 03:58, wrote:
>> > As you know, SMAP/SMEP may affect the 32-bit pv guests, after discussed
>> > internally, our current idea is that we can just disable t
Hi Andrew,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 3:42 PM
> To: Wu, Feng
> Cc: Andrew Cooper (andrew.coop...@citrix.com)
> ; Nakajima, Jun ;
> Wang, Yong Y ; xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> Subject: Re: SMAP/SMEP issues with 32-bit pv
>>> On 28.06.16 at 03:58, wrote:
> As you know, SMAP/SMEP may affect the 32-bit pv guests, after discussed
> internally, our current idea is that we can just disable this two feature for
> Xen hypervisor itself, hence only enable it for HVM guests. Do you think this
> is acceptable from your pe
Hi Andy,
As you know, SMAP/SMEP may affect the 32-bit pv guests, after discussed
internally, our current idea is that we can just disable this two feature for
Xen hypervisor itself, hence only enable it for HVM guests. Do you think this
is acceptable from your perspective?
Thanks,
Feng
__
