>From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:04 AM
>
>On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:26:36PM +, Sahita, Ravi wrote:
>[...]
>> >> This makes me think it doesn't matter if I do "xl destroy" or just
>> >> normal shutdown. And another test to normally shutdown guest
>>
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:26:36PM +, Sahita, Ravi wrote:
[...]
> >> This makes me think it doesn't matter if I do "xl destroy" or just
> >> normal shutdown. And another test to normally shutdown guest confirmed
> >> that.
> >>
> >> The machine I have is quite old and doesn't support EPT. The r
>From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:am...@hermes.cam.ac.uk] On Behalf Of
>Andrew Cooper
>Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 4:22 PM
>
>On 27/07/2015 19:09, Wei Liu wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:18:15PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
>>> Found this when I did "xl destroy" to a hvm guest *without* altp2m
>>> turned
On 27/07/2015 19:09, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:18:15PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
>> Found this when I did "xl destroy" to a hvm guest *without* altp2m turned
>> on.
>>
>> Current staging branch.
>>
>> (XEN) [ Xen-4.6-unstable x86_64 debug=y Tainted:C ]
>> (XEN) CPU:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:18:15PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> Found this when I did "xl destroy" to a hvm guest *without* altp2m turned
> on.
>
> Current staging branch.
>
> (XEN) [ Xen-4.6-unstable x86_64 debug=y Tainted:C ]
> (XEN) CPU:0
> (XEN) RIP:e008:[] vmx_vmenter_helpe
Found this when I did "xl destroy" to a hvm guest *without* altp2m turned
on.
Current staging branch.
(XEN) [ Xen-4.6-unstable x86_64 debug=y Tainted:C ]
(XEN) CPU:0
(XEN) RIP:e008:[] vmx_vmenter_helper+0x263/0x2f3
(XEN) RFLAGS: 00010242 CONTEXT: hypervisor (d0v0)
