On 2015/1/6 1:01, George Dunlap wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Tiejun Chen wrote:
RMRR Fix Design for Xen
This design is a goal to fix RMRR for Xen. It includes four sectors as
follows:
* Background
* What is RMRR
* Current RMRR Issues
* Desig
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Tiejun Chen wrote:
> RMRR Fix Design for Xen
>
> This design is a goal to fix RMRR for Xen. It includes four sectors as
> follows:
>
> * Background
> * What is RMRR
> * Current RMRR Issues
> * Design Overview
>
> We hope this can
I'll work out a new design proposal based on below content and previous
discussions. Thanks Tiejun for your hard-working and Jan for your careful
reviews so far.
For below comment:
> > Also there's clearly an alternative proposal: Drop support for sharing
> > page tables. Your colleagues will sure
Jan,
Thanks for your time but I'm not going to address your comments here.
Because I heard this design is totally not satisfied your expectation.
But this really was reviewed with several revisions by Kevin and Yang
before sending in public...
Anyway, I guess the only thing what I can do is
>>> On 19.12.14 at 02:21, wrote:
> #4 Something like USB, is still restricted to current RMRR implementation. We
>should work out this case.
This can mean all or nothing. My understanding is that right now code
assumes that USB devices won't use their RMRR-specified memory
regions post-boot (
Il 19/12/2014 02:21, Tiejun Chen ha scritto:
RMRR Fix Design for Xen
This design is a goal to fix RMRR for Xen. It includes four sectors as
follows:
* Background
* What is RMRR
* Current RMRR Issues
* Design Overview
We hope this can help us to understa
RMRR Fix Design for Xen
This design is a goal to fix RMRR for Xen. It includes four sectors as
follows:
* Background
* What is RMRR
* Current RMRR Issues
* Design Overview
We hope this can help us to understand current problem then figure out a
clean and bette
