On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 05:29:21PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-06-03 at 09:35 -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > > What I'm hearing from the x86 maintainers is that this is actually a
> > > high priority and not a "nice to have cleanup".
> > >
> > >> I picked 32-bit support, Elena is l
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 11:57:31AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> El 05/06/15 a les 23.52, Tim Deegan ha escrit:
> > At 18:21 +0100 on 05 Jun (1433528517), Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> On 05/06/15 18:16, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 05/06/15 17:43
On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 18:21 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> However, I expect it to turn into (HVM - Qemu + very few extra PV
> hypercalls)
Don't forget "- " and "- some other
stuff which I'm sure I'm forgetting from Tim's original list of things
to be made conditional".
Ian.
___
On 06/06/2015 10:41 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 06/06/15 10:57, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
El 05/06/15 a les 23.52, Tim Deegan ha escrit:
At 18:21 +0100 on 05 Jun (1433528517), Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 05/06/15 18:16, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 05/06/1
On 06/06/15 10:57, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> El 05/06/15 a les 23.52, Tim Deegan ha escrit:
>> At 18:21 +0100 on 05 Jun (1433528517), Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 05/06/15 18:16, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 05/06/15 17:43, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>
El 05/06/15 a les 23.52, Tim Deegan ha escrit:
> At 18:21 +0100 on 05 Jun (1433528517), Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 05/06/15 18:16, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 05/06/15 17:43, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 06/05/2015 12:16 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrot
At 18:21 +0100 on 05 Jun (1433528517), Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 05/06/15 18:16, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> On 05/06/15 17:43, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >>> On 06/05/2015 12:16 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> El 03/06/15 a les 14.08, Jan Beulich ha
On 05/06/15 18:16, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 05/06/15 17:43, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> On 06/05/2015 12:16 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
El 03/06/15 a les 14.08, Jan Beulich ha escrit:
On 03.06.15 at 12:02, wrote:
>> On Tue, 2 Jun 20
On 06/05/2015 01:16 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 05/06/15 17:43, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 06/05/2015 12:16 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
El 03/06/15 a les 14.08, Jan Beulich ha escrit:
On 03.06.15 at 12:02, wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Andrew Cooper
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 05/06/15 17:43, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > On 06/05/2015 12:16 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> El 03/06/15 a les 14.08, Jan Beulich ha escrit:
> >> On 03.06.15 at 12:02, wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > With my x86 mai
On 05/06/15 17:43, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 06/05/2015 12:16 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> El 03/06/15 a les 14.08, Jan Beulich ha escrit:
>> On 03.06.15 at 12:02, wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> With my x86 maintainer hat on, the following is an absolute
> mi
On 06/05/2015 12:21 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
El 03/06/15 a les 14.08, Jan Beulich ha escrit:
On 03.06.15 at 12:02, wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Andrew Cooper wrote:
With my x86 maintainer hat on, the following is an absolute minimum set
of prereq
On 06/05/2015 12:16 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
El 03/06/15 a les 14.08, Jan Beulich ha escrit:
On 03.06.15 at 12:02, wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Andrew Cooper wrote:
With my x86 maintainer hat on, the following is an absolute minimum set
of prerequisite for PVH.
* 32bit support
Could you ple
On Wed, 2015-06-03 at 09:35 -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > What I'm hearing from the x86 maintainers is that this is actually a
> > high priority and not a "nice to have cleanup".
> >
> >> I picked 32-bit support, Elena is looking into AMD
> > With the TODOs + these 2 being the things which the
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> El 03/06/15 a les 14.08, Jan Beulich ha escrit:
> On 03.06.15 at 12:02, wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >>> With my x86 maintainer hat on, the following is an absolute minimum set
> >>> of prerequisite for PVH.
> >>>
> >>> *
El 03/06/15 a les 14.08, Jan Beulich ha escrit:
On 03.06.15 at 12:02, wrote:
>> On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> With my x86 maintainer hat on, the following is an absolute minimum set
>>> of prerequisite for PVH.
>>>
>>> * 32bit support
>>
>> Could you please explain why 32bit is
On 06/03/2015 09:11 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Also it would be nice if any discussions at the hackathon, or anywhere
else, were written down and sent to the list. Otherwise people like
me, that didn't attend, will just think of them as rumors.
Here is the closest that I could find. This
On 06/03/2015 05:03 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 13:12 -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 06/02/2015 12:51 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.06.15 at 17:11, wrote:
Hello,
The document describing the PVH interface was committed 9 months
On 06/03/2015 02:09 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.06.15 at 19:12, wrote:
- working with shadow code (which is what we use when migrating HVM
guests). But the nice side-benefit is that we can then run PVH on
machines without VMX or SVM support.
Without VMX/SVM? What's the H then in PVH? Or d
On Wed, 3 Jun 2015, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 03.06.15 at 12:02, wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> With my x86 maintainer hat on, the following is an absolute minimum set
> >> of prerequisite for PVH.
> >>
> >> * 32bit support
> >
> > Could you please explain why 32bit i
>>> On 03.06.15 at 12:02, wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> With my x86 maintainer hat on, the following is an absolute minimum set
>> of prerequisite for PVH.
>>
>> * 32bit support
>
> Could you please explain why 32bit is important to get PVH out of tech
> preview? I don't s
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> With my x86 maintainer hat on, the following is an absolute minimum set
> of prerequisite for PVH.
>
> * 32bit support
Could you please explain why 32bit is important to get PVH out of tech
preview? I don't see 32 bit OSes as an important use case. Maybe
On Wed, 2015-06-03 at 10:06 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 03/06/15 10:00, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 18:09 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> * Removal of all /* TODO pvhfixme */ from the code
> > I guess this is not the literal tag:
> > ianc@cosworth:xen.git$ git grep -i TODO.p
On 03/06/15 10:00, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 18:09 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> * Removal of all /* TODO pvhfixme */ from the code
> I guess this is not the literal tag:
> ianc@cosworth:xen.git$ git grep -i TODO.pvhfixme xen
> ianc@cosworth:xen.git$ git grep -i TODO.*pvh xen
> i
On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 13:12 -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 06/02/2015 12:51 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 02.06.15 at 17:11, wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> The document describing the PVH interface was committed 9 months ago
> >>> [1], and
On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 18:09 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> * Removal of all /* TODO pvhfixme */ from the code
I guess this is not the literal tag:
ianc@cosworth:xen.git$ git grep -i TODO.pvhfixme xen
ianc@cosworth:xen.git$ git grep -i TODO.*pvh xen
ianc@cosworth:xen.git$
I think you meant:
ianc@co
>>> On 02.06.15 at 19:12, wrote:
>- working with shadow code (which is what we use when migrating HVM
> guests). But the nice side-benefit is that we can then run PVH on
> machines without VMX or SVM support.
Without VMX/SVM? What's the H then in PVH? Or did you mean
without EPT/NPT?
Jan
_
On 06/02/2015 12:51 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.06.15 at 17:11, wrote:
Hello,
The document describing the PVH interface was committed 9 months ago
[1], and since then there hasn't been any change regarding the
interface. PVH is still missing feat
On 02/06/15 17:51, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 02.06.15 at 17:11, wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> The document describing the PVH interface was committed 9 months ago
>>> [1], and since then there hasn't been any change regarding the
>>> interface. PVH is
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 02.06.15 at 17:11, wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The document describing the PVH interface was committed 9 months ago
> > [1], and since then there hasn't been any change regarding the
> > interface. PVH is still missing features in order to have featur
30 matches
Mail list logo
