Although discussing the goals is fun, feedback on the design of the
protocol is particularly welcome.
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Now that Xen 4.7 is out of the door, any more feedback on this?
>
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2016, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > a couple of
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 06/06/16 10:33, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > # Goals
> >
> > The goal of the protocol is to provide networking capabilities to any
> > guests, with the following added benefits:
> >
> > * guest networking should work out of the box with VPNs, wireles
On 06/06/16 10:33, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> # Goals
>
> The goal of the protocol is to provide networking capabilities to any
> guests, with the following added benefits:
>
> * guest networking should work out of the box with VPNs, wireless
> networks and any other complex network configurat
Now that Xen 4.7 is out of the door, any more feedback on this?
On Mon, 6 Jun 2016, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> a couple of months ago I started working on a new PV protocol for
> virtualizing syscalls. I named it XenSock, as its main purpose is to
> allow the implementation of the PO
: joao.m.mart...@oracle.com; Wei Liu; Roger Pau Monne
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: XenSock brainstorming
> >
> > On 06/06/16 10:33, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > a couple of months ago I started working on a new PV protoc
On Mon, 6 Jun 2016, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 06/06/16 10:33, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > a couple of months ago I started working on a new PV protocol for
> > virtualizing syscalls. I named it XenSock, as its main purpose is to
> > allow the implementation of the POSIX socket API
> -Original Message-
> From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of
> Andrew Cooper
> Sent: 06 June 2016 10:58
> To: Stefano Stabellini; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org
> Cc: joao.m.mart...@oracle.com; Wei Liu; Roger Pau Monne
> Subject: Re: [Xe
On 06/06/16 10:33, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> a couple of months ago I started working on a new PV protocol for
> virtualizing syscalls. I named it XenSock, as its main purpose is to
> allow the implementation of the POSIX socket API in a domain other than
> the one of the caller. It a
Hi all,
a couple of months ago I started working on a new PV protocol for
virtualizing syscalls. I named it XenSock, as its main purpose is to
allow the implementation of the POSIX socket API in a domain other than
the one of the caller. It allows connect, accept, recvmsg, sendmsg, etc
to be imple
