At 08:49 +0100 on 04 May (1430729386), Jan Beulich wrote:
> While I got a review from Andrew, I'm still waiting for an ack (or nak).
Acked-by: Tim Deegan
I expect Coverity will complain on architectures where this isn't
necessary, but acked nonetheless.
Tim.
___
While I got a review from Andrew, I'm still waiting for an ack (or nak).
Thanks, Jan
>>> On 22.04.15 at 13:56, wrote:
> Instead saturate the value if the input can't be represented in the
> respective struct domain field.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>
> --- a/xen/common/domctl.c
> +++ b/xe
