On 01/26/2017 06:00 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 17:42 +0200, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
>> On 01/26/2017 05:14 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>>> You mean you'd want to implement xc_vcpu_pause() by means of
>>> the XEN_DOMCTL_gdbsx_pausevcpu?
>>>
>>> What's the use case for that, and d
On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 17:42 +0200, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
> On 01/26/2017 05:14 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > You mean you'd want to implement xc_vcpu_pause() by means of
> > the XEN_DOMCTL_gdbsx_pausevcpu?
> >
> > What's the use case for that, and does it fit with the
> > implementation
> > of sa
>>> On 26.01.17 at 13:08, wrote:
> I see that there's currently no xc_vcpu_pause() (there's only
> xc_domain_pause(), which freezes all the VCPUs), but there's
> XEN_DOMCTL_gdbsx_pausevcpu, which is only used by
> tools/debugger/gdbsx/xg/xg_main.c.
>
> Wouldn't it make sense to have a "regular" D
On 01/26/2017 05:14 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> [Adding tools people, and Andrew's which, according to git history,
> has touched the involved (Xen) code for last :-) ]
>
> On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 14:08 +0200, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I see that there's currently no xc_vcpu_pause() (t
[Adding tools people, and Andrew's which, according to git history,
has touched the involved (Xen) code for last :-) ]
On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 14:08 +0200, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I see that there's currently no xc_vcpu_pause() (there's only
> xc_domain_pause(), which freezes all the V
Hello,
I see that there's currently no xc_vcpu_pause() (there's only
xc_domain_pause(), which freezes all the VCPUs), but there's
XEN_DOMCTL_gdbsx_pausevcpu, which is only used by
tools/debugger/gdbsx/xg/xg_main.c.
Wouldn't it make sense to have a "regular" DOMCTL in libxc that the
debugger, as w
