On 17/03/15 12:54, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:08:50PM +, Ian Murray wrote:
>> On 16/03/15 14:12, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 09:34:16PM +, Ian Murray wrote:
Hi,
I have a domU guest that booted fine under Xen 4.4.1 wi
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:08:50PM +, Ian Murray wrote:
> On 16/03/15 14:12, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 09:34:16PM +, Ian Murray wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have a domU guest that booted fine under Xen 4.4.1 with pvh=1 but now
> >> fails to boot with it under
On 16/03/15 14:12, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 09:34:16PM +, Ian Murray wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a domU guest that booted fine under Xen 4.4.1 with pvh=1 but now
>> fails to boot with it under Xen 4.5.0. Removing pvh=1, i.e. booting it as
>> traditional PV results
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 09:34:16PM +, Ian Murray wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a domU guest that booted fine under Xen 4.4.1 with pvh=1 but now fails
> to boot with it under Xen 4.5.0. Removing pvh=1, i.e. booting it as
> traditional PV results in it booting fine.
>
> The only odd thing is that I
Hi,
I have a domU guest that booted fine under Xen 4.4.1 with pvh=1 but now fails
to boot with it under Xen 4.5.0. Removing pvh=1, i.e. booting it as traditional
PV results in it booting fine.
The only odd thing is that I had to compile with debug=y on Config.mk to avoid
a compiler warning tha
