On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 02:48:31AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 18.04.17 at 09:34, wrote:
> > (XEN) Before DMA_GCMD_TE
> > (
> >
> > The hang seems to happen when writing DMA_GCMD_TE to the global command
> > register, which enables the DMA remapping. After that the box is completely
> > un
>>> On 18.04.17 at 09:34, wrote:
> (XEN) Before DMA_GCMD_TE
> (
>
> The hang seems to happen when writing DMA_GCMD_TE to the global command
> register, which enables the DMA remapping. After that the box is completely
> unresponsive, not even the watchdog is working.
How sure are you that this i
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 03:04:51AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Roger Pau Monné [mailto:roger@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 11:35 PM
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Although PVHv2 Dom0 is not yet finished, I've been trying the current code
> > on
> > different hardware, and found
> From: Roger Pau Monné [mailto:roger@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 11:35 PM
>
> Hello,
>
> Although PVHv2 Dom0 is not yet finished, I've been trying the current code
> on
> different hardware, and found that with pre-Haswell Intel hardware PVHv2
> Dom0
> completely freezes the b
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 01:57:10PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 01:47:47PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 01:21:01PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> >On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 01:12:27PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>> >[...]
>> >> It works. I can test for you
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 01:47:47PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 01:21:01PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 01:12:27PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
> >[...]
> >> It works. I can test for you when you send out a formal patch.
> >
> >Thanks for the testing, will
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 01:21:01PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 01:12:27PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>[...]
>> It works. I can test for you when you send out a formal patch.
>
>Thanks for the testing, will send formal patch shortly.
>
>Have you been able to reproduce the IOMM
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 01:12:27PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
[...]
> It works. I can test for you when you send out a formal patch.
Thanks for the testing, will send formal patch shortly.
Have you been able to reproduce the IOMMU issue with that, or you just hit the
panic at the end of PVH Dom0 buil
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 11:38:33AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:49:45AM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 09:38:54AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> >On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 09:03:12AM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 08:47:48AM +010
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:49:45AM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 09:38:54AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 09:03:12AM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 08:47:48AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> >On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 07:32:45AM +0
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 09:38:54AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 09:03:12AM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 08:47:48AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> >On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 07:32:45AM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 04:34:41PM +010
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 09:03:12AM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 08:47:48AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 07:32:45AM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 04:34:41PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> >Hello,
> >> >
> >> >Although PVHv2 Do
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 08:47:48AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 07:32:45AM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 04:34:41PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> >Hello,
>> >
>> >Although PVHv2 Dom0 is not yet finished, I've been trying the current code
>> >on
>> >
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 07:32:45AM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 04:34:41PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >Although PVHv2 Dom0 is not yet finished, I've been trying the current code on
> >different hardware, and found that with pre-Haswell Intel hardware PVHv2 Dom
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 04:34:41PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Although PVHv2 Dom0 is not yet finished, I've been trying the current code on
>different hardware, and found that with pre-Haswell Intel hardware PVHv2 Dom0
>completely freezes the box when calling iommu_hwdom_init in dom0_
Hello,
Although PVHv2 Dom0 is not yet finished, I've been trying the current code on
different hardware, and found that with pre-Haswell Intel hardware PVHv2 Dom0
completely freezes the box when calling iommu_hwdom_init in dom0_construct_pvh.
OTOH the same doesn't happen when using a newer CPU (ie
16 matches
Mail list logo