On 21/11/14 16:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.11.14 at 16:48, wrote:
>> On 21/11/14 15:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 21.11.14 at 16:01, wrote:
On 21/11/14 14:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.11.14 at 15:39, wrote:
>> Trying to do PCI-passthrough with a 32-bit pv-domain I pass
>>> On 21.11.14 at 16:48, wrote:
> On 21/11/14 15:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 21.11.14 at 16:01, wrote:
>>> On 21/11/14 14:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 21.11.14 at 15:39, wrote:
> Trying to do PCI-passthrough with a 32-bit pv-domain I passed the
> wrong device to the domain. The
On 21/11/14 15:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.11.14 at 16:01, wrote:
>> On 21/11/14 14:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 21.11.14 at 15:39, wrote:
Trying to do PCI-passthrough with a 32-bit pv-domain I passed the
wrong device to the domain. The MMIO address was too large for a
MF
>>> On 21.11.14 at 16:17, wrote:
> On 11/21/2014 03:54 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 21.11.14 at 15:39, wrote:
>>> Trying to do PCI-passthrough with a 32-bit pv-domain I passed the
>>> wrong device to the domain. The MMIO address was too large for a
>>> MFN of a 32-bit system (it was 3800032000
>>> On 21.11.14 at 16:01, wrote:
> On 21/11/14 14:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 21.11.14 at 15:39, wrote:
>>> Trying to do PCI-passthrough with a 32-bit pv-domain I passed the
>>> wrong device to the domain. The MMIO address was too large for a
>>> MFN of a 32-bit system (it was 38000320-38
On 21/11/14 15:04, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 11/21/2014 03:45 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 21/11/14 14:39, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> again a fallout from my "linear p2m list" tests:
>>>
>>> Trying to do PCI-passthrough with a 32-bit pv-domain I passed the
>>> wrong device to the domain
On 11/21/2014 03:54 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.11.14 at 15:39, wrote:
Trying to do PCI-passthrough with a 32-bit pv-domain I passed the
wrong device to the domain. The MMIO address was too large for a
MFN of a 32-bit system (it was 38000320-3800036f).
Instead of rejecting the operati
On 11/21/2014 03:45 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 21/11/14 14:39, Juergen Gross wrote:
Hi,
again a fallout from my "linear p2m list" tests:
Trying to do PCI-passthrough with a 32-bit pv-domain I passed the
wrong device to the domain. The MMIO address was too large for a
MFN of a 32-bit system (i
On 21/11/14 14:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.11.14 at 15:39, wrote:
>> Trying to do PCI-passthrough with a 32-bit pv-domain I passed the
>> wrong device to the domain. The MMIO address was too large for a
>> MFN of a 32-bit system (it was 38000320-3800036f).
>>
>> Instead of rejecting
>>> On 21.11.14 at 15:39, wrote:
> Trying to do PCI-passthrough with a 32-bit pv-domain I passed the
> wrong device to the domain. The MMIO address was too large for a
> MFN of a 32-bit system (it was 38000320-3800036f).
>
> Instead of rejecting the operation Xen tried to perform it resul
On 21/11/14 14:39, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Hi,
>
> again a fallout from my "linear p2m list" tests:
>
> Trying to do PCI-passthrough with a 32-bit pv-domain I passed the
> wrong device to the domain. The MMIO address was too large for a
> MFN of a 32-bit system (it was 38000320-3800036f).
>
Hi,
again a fallout from my "linear p2m list" tests:
Trying to do PCI-passthrough with a 32-bit pv-domain I passed the
wrong device to the domain. The MMIO address was too large for a
MFN of a 32-bit system (it was 38000320-3800036f).
Instead of rejecting the operation Xen tried to perf
12 matches
Mail list logo
