On Mon 18-07-2016 1:26 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Yes, this patch has been misbackported to the stable tree (at least 4.1
> and maybe others which took it over from there). See
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160714175521.3675e...@gandalf.local.home
Symptoms looks similar to this one:
http://marc.info
On Mon 18-07-16 12:17:58, Ian Jackson wrote:
> The Xen Project CI system (`osstest') reports that the current tip of
> the Linux 3.18 and Linux 4.1 stable branches have serious problems
> booting Xen.
>
> Our automatic bisector has completed its work and fingered (in 3.18)
> a2d8c5147532 "mm/swap.
The Xen Project CI system (`osstest') reports that the current tip of
the Linux 3.18 and Linux 4.1 stable branches have serious problems
booting Xen.
Our automatic bisector has completed its work and fingered (in 3.18)
a2d8c5147532 "mm/swap.c: flush lru pvecs on compound page arrival"
(and a backp
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 3.18 and Linux 4.1
reproducible OOM crashes"):
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 01:56:24PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
...
> > It seems likely that this is a real bug, but whether it's in Xen or
> > Linux is not clear rig
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 01:56:24PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> osstest service owner writes ("[linux-3.18 test] 97278: regressions - FAIL"):
> > flight 97278 linux-3.18 real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/97278/
> >
> > Regressions :-(
> >
> > Tests which did not succ
osstest service owner writes ("[linux-3.18 test] 97278: regressions - FAIL"):
> flight 97278 linux-3.18 real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/97278/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
...
> test
