>>> On 18.09.15 at 21:31, wrote:
> So locally I have in the xen/ (the hypervisor) "make menuconfig" working
> but I'd likely address any concerns you might have upfront in the
> patches. Effectively the xen/ directory now when built runs "make
> defconfig" before it builds to generate the configur
On 9/3/15 10:00 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 03.09.15 at 16:04, wrote:
>> On 9/3/15 5:31 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 02.09.15 at 19:50, wrote:
* target only the xen/ directory tree (i.e. not the toolstack, stubdoms
or docs)
>>>
>>> As just said in another reply, allowing for ./co
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Long term, yes we can tackle tools and stubdoms as well but initially I
> was trying to eat the elephant one bite at a time. My idea was that we
> would do xen/ first and you would have to go into that directory and run
> "make defconfig/menuconfig/config
On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 11:59 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 03/09/15 10:56, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 19:29 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > > On 02/09/15 18:50, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> > > > I just wanted to bring this to a top level post since Jonathan
> > > > Creekmore
> > >
On 03/09/15 10:56, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 19:29 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 02/09/15 18:50, Doug Goldstein wrote:
I just wanted to bring this to a top level post since Jonathan
Creekmore
and myself have talked with a few maintainers in different threads and
on IRC about po
>>> On 03.09.15 at 16:04, wrote:
> On 9/3/15 5:31 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 02.09.15 at 19:50, wrote:
>>> * target only the xen/ directory tree (i.e. not the toolstack, stubdoms
>>> or docs)
>>
>> As just said in another reply, allowing for ./configure to pass down
>> options to the config
On 9/3/15 4:56 AM, Tim Deegan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At 12:50 -0500 on 02 Sep (1441198200), Doug Goldstein wrote:
>> I just wanted to bring this to a top level post since Jonathan Creekmore
>> and myself have talked with a few maintainers in different threads and
>> on IRC about potentially using Kconfi
On 9/3/15 5:31 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.09.15 at 19:50, wrote:
>> * target only the xen/ directory tree (i.e. not the toolstack, stubdoms
>> or docs)
>
> As just said in another reply, allowing for ./configure to pass down
> options to the configure mechanism in xen/ would seem desirable
On 9/3/15 4:56 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 19:29 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 02/09/15 18:50, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>>> I just wanted to bring this to a top level post since Jonathan
>>> Creekmore
>>> and myself have talked with a few maintainers in different threads and
>
>>> On 02.09.15 at 19:50, wrote:
> * target only the xen/ directory tree (i.e. not the toolstack, stubdoms
> or docs)
As just said in another reply, allowing for ./configure to pass down
options to the configure mechanism in xen/ would seem desirable (as
long as configuring in xen/ alone would st
>>> On 03.09.15 at 12:09, wrote:
> At 10:56 +0100 on 03 Sep (1441277769), Ian Campbell wrote:
>> Is the proposal here then to abandon autoconf for the tools subtree in
>> favour of Kconfig? Or maybe to somehow hybridize autoconf (for e.g. library
>> and feature detection) with Kconfig (for user se
At 10:56 +0100 on 03 Sep (1441277769), Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 19:29 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 02/09/15 18:50, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> > > I just wanted to bring this to a top level post since Jonathan
> > > Creekmore
> > > and myself have talked with a few maintainers
On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 19:29 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 02/09/15 18:50, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> > I just wanted to bring this to a top level post since Jonathan
> > Creekmore
> > and myself have talked with a few maintainers in different threads and
> > on IRC about potentially using Kconfig
Hi,
At 12:50 -0500 on 02 Sep (1441198200), Doug Goldstein wrote:
> I just wanted to bring this to a top level post since Jonathan Creekmore
> and myself have talked with a few maintainers in different threads and
> on IRC about potentially using Kconfig and/or Kbuild for Xen.
If we're going to ne
On 02/09/2015 21:28, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> On 9/2/15 1:29 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 02/09/15 18:50, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>>> I just wanted to bring this to a top level post since Jonathan Creekmore
>>> and myself have talked with a few maintainers in different threads and
>>> on IRC about p
On 9/2/15 1:29 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 02/09/15 18:50, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>> I just wanted to bring this to a top level post since Jonathan Creekmore
>> and myself have talked with a few maintainers in different threads and
>> on IRC about potentially using Kconfig and/or Kbuild for Xen. B
On 02/09/15 18:50, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> I just wanted to bring this to a top level post since Jonathan Creekmore
> and myself have talked with a few maintainers in different threads and
> on IRC about potentially using Kconfig and/or Kbuild for Xen. Basically
> I would like to get a rough idea o
I just wanted to bring this to a top level post since Jonathan Creekmore
and myself have talked with a few maintainers in different threads and
on IRC about potentially using Kconfig and/or Kbuild for Xen. Basically
I would like to get a rough idea on what the Xen community wants the
system to look
18 matches
Mail list logo
