Re: [Xen-devel] KVM PV

2017-10-06 Thread Wanpeng Li
2017-10-03 3:11 GMT+08:00 Nadav Amit : > Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> On 02/10/2017 12:36, George Dunlap wrote: > Although I'm not business man, I don't think the top cloud provider[s] > would allow nested virtualization, however mature nested virtualization > is. Even xen-pv is unable to

Re: [Xen-devel] KVM PV

2017-10-03 Thread Nadav Amit
Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 02/10/2017 12:36, George Dunlap wrote: Although I'm not business man, I don't think the top cloud provider[s] would allow nested virtualization, however mature nested virtualization is. Even xen-pv is unable to be nested in the aws and azure. >>> >>> Chec

Re: [Xen-devel] KVM PV

2017-10-02 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 02/10/2017 12:36, George Dunlap wrote: >>> Although I'm not business man, I don't think the top cloud provider[s] >>> would allow nested virtualization, however mature nested virtualization >>> is. Even xen-pv is unable to be nested in the aws and azure. >> >> Check the contributors to KVM neste

Re: [Xen-devel] KVM PV (was: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/lguest: remove lguest support)

2017-10-02 Thread George Dunlap
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 4:39 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > - Lai Jiangshan ha scritto: >> On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 12:39 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> > On 29/09/2017 17:47, Lai Jiangshan wrote: >> >> Hello, all >> >> >> >> An interesting (at least to me) thinking came up to me when I found >> >

Re: [Xen-devel] KVM PV (was: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/lguest: remove lguest support)

2017-10-02 Thread George Dunlap
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 5:39 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 29/09/2017 17:47, Lai Jiangshan wrote: >> Hello, all >> >> An interesting (at least to me) thinking came up to me when I found >> that the lguest was removed. But I don't have enough knowledge >> to find out the answer nor energy to implem

Re: [Xen-devel] KVM PV (was: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/lguest: remove lguest support)

2017-09-29 Thread Lai Jiangshan
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 12:39 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 29/09/2017 17:47, Lai Jiangshan wrote: >> Hello, all >> >> An interesting (at least to me) thinking came up to me when I found >> that the lguest was removed. But I don't have enough knowledge >> to find out the answer nor energy to imple

[Xen-devel] KVM PV (was: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/lguest: remove lguest support)

2017-09-29 Thread Lai Jiangshan
Hello, all An interesting (at least to me) thinking came up to me when I found that the lguest was removed. But I don't have enough knowledge to find out the answer nor energy to implement it in some time. Is it possible to implement kvm-pv which allows kvm to run on the boxes without hardware vi

Re: [Xen-devel] KVM PV (was: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/lguest: remove lguest support)

2017-09-29 Thread Paolo Bonzini
- Lai Jiangshan ha scritto: > On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 12:39 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 29/09/2017 17:47, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > >> Hello, all > >> > >> An interesting (at least to me) thinking came up to me when I found > >> that the lguest was removed. But I don't have enough knowledge

Re: [Xen-devel] KVM PV (was: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/lguest: remove lguest support)

2017-09-29 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 29/09/2017 17:47, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > Hello, all > > An interesting (at least to me) thinking came up to me when I found > that the lguest was removed. But I don't have enough knowledge > to find out the answer nor energy to implement it in some time. > > Is it possible to implement kvm-pv