Antti Kantee writes ("Re: GPF Heisenbug with rumprun-xen"):
> On 05/02/15 15:51, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > (Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [rumpuserxen test] 33416: regressions - FAIL)
>
> Aha! I told you I don't believe in cosmic rays ;)
:-).
> The diffs for rumpuserxen and netbsdsrc between those re
On 05/02/15 15:51, Ian Jackson wrote:
It looks to be some sort of Heisenbug in the rump kernel stuff.
I agree. We had a failure on the 16th of January which looked like
some kind of race:
(Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [rumpuserxen test] 33416: regressions - FAIL)
Aha! I told you I don't belie
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.5-testing test] 34157: regressions
- FAIL"):
> > > > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/34157/
...
> > > > test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64 11
> > > > rumpuserxen-demo-xenstorels/xenstorels fail REGR. vs. 34088
Guest console contains
