> On Dec 13, 2016, at 12:16 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>
>> From: Li, Liang Z
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 11:58 AM
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We are now working on enabling 5 level paging & 5 level EPT for XEN. We need
>> the
>> community's opinions about the following aspects:
>>
>> 1. Should
On 13/12/16 05:44, Li, Liang Z wrote:
>> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Future support of 5-level paging in Xen:wq
>>
>>> From: Li, Liang Z
>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 11:58 AM
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> We are now working
>>> On 13.12.16 at 04:57, wrote:
> 1. Should we enable 5 level paging for PV guest ? (You are discussing)
Personally I think we should, but as you say - we haven't settled on
this yet.
> 2. Should we make the 5 level paging and 4 level paging supported with one
> binary?
May I suggest to mak
> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Future support of 5-level paging in Xen:wq
>
> > From: Li, Liang Z
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 11:58 AM
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We are now working on enabling 5 level paging & 5 level EPT for XEN.
> > We need
> > From: Li, Liang Z
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 11:58 AM
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We are now working on enabling 5 level paging & 5 level EPT for XEN. We need
> the
> > community's opinions about the following aspects:
> >
> > 1. Should we enable 5 level paging for PV guest ? (You are di
> From: Li, Liang Z
> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 11:58 AM
>
> Hi All,
>
> We are now working on enabling 5 level paging & 5 level EPT for XEN. We need
> the
> community's opinions about the following aspects:
>
> 1. Should we enable 5 level paging for PV guest ? (You are discussing)
> 2.
Hi All,
We are now working on enabling 5 level paging & 5 level EPT for XEN. We need
the community's opinions about the following aspects:
1. Should we enable 5 level paging for PV guest ? (You are discussing)
2. Should we make the 5 level paging and 4 level paging supported with one
binary?
> > So basically you are telling us that due to nested virt on AWS we will
> > never be able to drop PV support, right?
>
> That's right, although never say never :-)
Unless cloud provides exposes VMX to the guests (nested virtualization).
>
>
> > Why are we pushing PVH then?
>
> Because it i
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 09/12/16 20:31, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >> On 09/12/16 00:50, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 08/12/2016 19:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Thu
On 09/12/16 20:31, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 09/12/16 00:50, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 08/12/2016 19:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 08/12/16
On 09/12/16 19:31, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 09/12/16 00:50, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 08/12/2016 19:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 08/12/16
On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 09/12/16 00:50, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> On 08/12/2016 19:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 08/12/16 16:46, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > The first ro
On 09/12/16 00:50, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 08/12/2016 19:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 08/12/16 16:46, Juergen Gross wrote:
> The first round of (very preliminary) patches for supporting the
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 08/12/2016 19:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> On 08/12/16 16:46, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >>> The first round of (very preliminary) patches for supporting the new
> >>> 5-level paging of future Intel x86 pro
14 matches
Mail list logo
