On 09/18/2017 08:59 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 05:08:18PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote:
>> [ Realized that I didn't CC the maintainers,
>> so doing that now, +Linux folks +PV interfaces czar
>> Sorry for the noise! ]
>>
>> On 09/08/2017 09:49 AM, Joao Martins wrote:
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 05:08:18PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote:
> [ Realized that I didn't CC the maintainers,
> so doing that now, +Linux folks +PV interfaces czar
> Sorry for the noise! ]
>
> On 09/08/2017 09:49 AM, Joao Martins wrote:
> > [Forgot two important details regarding Xenbus states]
On 09/15/2017 12:34 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 15/09/17 13:19, Wei Liu wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 05:18:44PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote:
>>> On 09/14/2017 05:10 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 05:53:54PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote:
> Hey!
>
> We wanted to brought
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 01:34:49PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>
> Backends reads and seeds with (and assuming it passes backend validation
> ofc):
>
> /local/domain/0/backend/vif/8/0/multi-queue-max-queues = 2
> /local/domain/0/backend/vbd/8/51713/multi-queue-max-que
On 15/09/17 13:19, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 05:18:44PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote:
>> On 09/14/2017 05:10 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 05:53:54PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote:
Hey!
We wanted to brought up this small proposal regarding the lack of
pa
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 05:18:44PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote:
> On 09/14/2017 05:10 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 05:53:54PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote:
> >> Hey!
> >>
> >> We wanted to brought up this small proposal regarding the lack of
> >> parameterization on PV devices on Xen.
On 09/14/2017 05:10 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 05:53:54PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote:
>> Hey!
>>
>> We wanted to brought up this small proposal regarding the lack of
>> parameterization on PV devices on Xen.
>>
>> Currently users don't have a way for enforce and control what
>> fea
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 05:53:54PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote:
> Hey!
>
> We wanted to brought up this small proposal regarding the lack of
> parameterization on PV devices on Xen.
>
> Currently users don't have a way for enforce and control what
> features/queues/etc the backend provides. So far
[ Realized that I didn't CC the maintainers,
so doing that now, +Linux folks +PV interfaces czar
Sorry for the noise! ]
On 09/08/2017 09:49 AM, Joao Martins wrote:
> [Forgot two important details regarding Xenbus states]
> On 09/07/2017 05:53 PM, Joao Martins wrote:
>> Hey!
>>
>> We wanted to
[Forgot two important details regarding Xenbus states]
On 09/07/2017 05:53 PM, Joao Martins wrote:
> Hey!
>
> We wanted to brought up this small proposal regarding the lack of
> parameterization on PV devices on Xen.
>
> Currently users don't have a way for enforce and control what
> features/qu
Hey!
We wanted to brought up this small proposal regarding the lack of
parameterization on PV devices on Xen.
Currently users don't have a way for enforce and control what
features/queues/etc the backend provides. So far there's only global parameters
on backends, and specs do not mention anythin
11 matches
Mail list logo