>>> On 02.12.15 at 19:34, wrote:
> On 02/12/15 18:21, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>> Why would that vmread fail there and why would the call trace tell me
>> it's in vmx_vmenter_helper?
>
> The symbol information is incorrect because of the bugframe being inside
> an UNLIKELY() block.
>
> I have a pa
On 02/12/15 18:38, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Andrew Cooper
> mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com>> wrote:
>
> On 02/12/15 18:21, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Andrew Cooper
>> mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com>> wrote:
>>
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Andrew Cooper
wrote:
> On 02/12/15 18:21, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Andrew Cooper
> wrote:
>
>> On 01/12/15 01:21, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Razvan Cojocaru <
>> rcojoc...@bitdefender.c
On 02/12/15 18:21, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Andrew Cooper
> mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com>> wrote:
>
> On 01/12/15 01:21, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Razvan Cojocaru
>> mailto:rcojoc...@bitdefender.com>> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Andrew Cooper
wrote:
> On 01/12/15 01:21, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Razvan Cojocaru <
> rcojoc...@bitdefender.com> wrote:
>
>> On 12/01/2015 01:32 AM, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> > I'm trying to extend the current vm
>>> On 01.12.15 at 11:51, wrote:
> Jan: This is a good example of why unlikely regions should have
> symbols. The stack trace from this bug is actively misleading because
> the symbol information for %eip is wrong.
And I didn't object to there being a single label put at the beginning
of the "un
On 01/12/15 10:40, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 01/12/15 01:21, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Razvan Cojocaru
>> mailto:rcojoc...@bitdefender.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/01/2015 01:32 AM, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> > I'm trying to extend the curr
On 01/12/15 01:21, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Razvan Cojocaru
> mailto:rcojoc...@bitdefender.com>> wrote:
>
> On 12/01/2015 01:32 AM, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I'm trying to extend the current vm_event system to be able to
> emulate
>
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Razvan Cojocaru
wrote:
> On 12/01/2015 01:32 AM, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I'm trying to extend the current vm_event system to be able to emulate
> > over an in-guest breakpoint using the VM_EVENT_FLAG_SET_EMUL_READ_DATA
> > feature. The idea is to ha
On 12/01/2015 01:32 AM, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm trying to extend the current vm_event system to be able to emulate
> over an in-guest breakpoint using the VM_EVENT_FLAG_SET_EMUL_READ_DATA
> feature. The idea is to have the vm_event listener send back the
> contents of the memory that
Hi all,
I'm trying to extend the current vm_event system to be able to emulate over
an in-guest breakpoint using the VM_EVENT_FLAG_SET_EMUL_READ_DATA feature.
The idea is to have the vm_event listener send back the contents of the
memory that was overwritten by the breakpoint instruction, have Xen
11 matches
Mail list logo