On 11/03/2017 06:35 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 03/11/17 19:29, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 05:57:52PM +, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2017 02:52 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
On 11/03/2017 02:14 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:55:11AM +0
George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging"):
> Well, with a looping xen-build going on in the guest, I've done 40 local
> migrates with no problems yet.
>
> But Roger -- is this on emulated devices only, no PV drivers?
Yes. None of our Wi
On 03/11/17 19:29, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 05:57:52PM +, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 11/03/2017 02:52 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2017 02:14 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:55:11AM +, Paul Durrant wrote:
> Hmm. I wonder whethe
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 05:57:52PM +, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 11/03/2017 02:52 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
> > On 11/03/2017 02:14 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:55:11AM +, Paul Durrant wrote:
> >>> Hmm. I wonder whether the guest is actually healthy after the mig
On 11/03/2017 02:52 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 11/03/2017 02:14 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:55:11AM +, Paul Durrant wrote:
>>> Hmm. I wonder whether the guest is actually healthy after the migrate. One
>>> could imagine a situation where the storage device model
Kurth
>>> ; Wei Liu ; Julien Grall
>>> ; committ...@xenproject.org; xen-devel >> de...@lists.xenproject.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:20:10AM +, Paul Durrant wrote:
>>&
committ...@xenproject.org; xen-devel > de...@lists.xenproject.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:20:10AM +, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Roger Pau Monne
Hi Ian,
On 02/11/17 13:27, Ian Jackson wrote:
Julien Grall writes ("Re: Commit moratorium to staging"):
Thank you for the explanation. I agree with the force push to unblock
master (and other tree I mentioned).
I will force push all the affected trees, but in a reactive way
because I base eac
Julien Grall writes ("Re: Commit moratorium to staging"):
> Thank you for the explanation. I agree with the force push to unblock
> master (and other tree I mentioned).
I will force push all the affected trees, but in a reactive way
because I base each force push on a test report - so it won't be
Roger Pau Monné writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging"):
> Is there anyway to get that from windows in an automatic way? If not I
> could test that with a Debian guest. In fact it might even be a good
> thing for Linux based guest to be added to the regular m
On 11/01/2017 02:07 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> So, investigations (mostly by Roger, and also a bit of archaeology in
> the osstest db by me) have determined:
>
> * This bug is 100% reproducible on affected hosts. The repro is
> to boot the Windows guest, save/restore it, then migrate it,
> then
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Pau Monne
> Sent: 02 November 2017 09:42
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: Ian Jackson ; Lars Kurth
> ; Wei Liu ; Julien Grall
> ; committ...@xenproject.org; xen-devel de...@lists.xenproject.org>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Commit mo
rrant ;
> > committ...@xenproject.org; xen-devel
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 04:17:10PM +, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:07:48PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > >
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Pau Monne
> Sent: 02 November 2017 09:15
> To: Roger Pau Monne
> Cc: Ian Jackson ; Lars Kurth
> ; Wei Liu ; Julien Grall
> ; Paul Durrant ;
> committ...@xenproject.org; xen-devel
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 04:17:10PM +, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:07:48PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > * Affected hosts differ from unaffected hosts according to cpuid.
> > Roger has repro'd the bug on an unaffected host by masking out
> > certain cpuid bits. There
Hi Ian,
On 11/01/2017 04:54 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
Julien Grall writes ("Re: Commit moratorium to staging"):
Hi Ian,
Thank you for the detailed e-mail.
On 11/01/2017 02:07 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
Furthermore, the test is not intermittent, so a force push will be
effective in the following sen
Julien Grall writes ("Re: Commit moratorium to staging"):
> Hi Ian,
>
> Thank you for the detailed e-mail.
>
> On 11/01/2017 02:07 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Furthermore, the test is not intermittent, so a force push will be
> > effective in the following sense: we would only get a "spurious" pas
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:07:48PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> So, investigations (mostly by Roger, and also a bit of archaeology in
> the osstest db by me) have determined:
>
> * This bug is 100% reproducible on affected hosts. The repro is
> to boot the Windows guest, save/restore it, then mi
Hi Ian,
Thank you for the detailed e-mail.
On 11/01/2017 02:07 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
So, investigations (mostly by Roger, and also a bit of archaeology in
the osstest db by me) have determined:
* This bug is 100% reproducible on affected hosts. The repro is
to boot the Windows guest, save
So, investigations (mostly by Roger, and also a bit of archaeology in
the osstest db by me) have determined:
* This bug is 100% reproducible on affected hosts. The repro is
to boot the Windows guest, save/restore it, then migrate it,
then shut down. (This is from an IRL conversation with Rog
> -Original Message-
> From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 01 November 2017 10:48
> To: Roger Pau Monne
> Cc: Julien Grall ; committ...@xenproject.org; xen-
> devel ; Lars Kurth ;
> Paul Durrant ; Wei Liu
> Subject: Re: Commit moratorium to staging
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 04:52:37PM +, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>
> I have to admit I have no idea why Windows clears the STS power bit
> and then completely ignores it on certain occasions.
>
> I'm also afraid I have no idea how to debug Windows in order to know
> why this event is acknowledged
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:49:35AM +, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Master lags 15 days behind staging due to tests failing reliably on some of
> the hardware in osstest (see [1]).
>
> At the moment a force push is not feasible because the same tests passes on
> different hardware (see [2
Hi all,
Master lags 15 days behind staging due to tests failing reliably on some
of the hardware in osstest (see [1]).
At the moment a force push is not feasible because the same tests passes
on different hardware (see [2]).
Please avoid committing any more patches unless it is fixing a tes
>>> On 01.06.17 at 19:57, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 26/05/17 07:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 25.05.17 at 20:00, wrote:
>>> On 05/25/2017 01:46 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
On 25/05/17 18:08, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Is this:
>
> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-
Hi,
On 26/05/17 07:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.05.17 at 20:00, wrote:
On 05/25/2017 01:46 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
On 25/05/17 18:08, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
Is this:
https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-05/msg02340.html
being deferred to the next RC (if we are having
On 25/05/17 16:54, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
The patches fixing the 2 outstanding regressions have been merged.
I would like to make another attempt to branch with the RC (4.9 RC7). I
don't want to branch when master != staging, so please avoid committing
new patches to staging now to let maste
Hi Jan,
On 26/05/17 07:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.05.17 at 20:00, wrote:
On 05/25/2017 01:46 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
On 25/05/17 18:08, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
Is this:
https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-05/msg02340.html
being deferred to the next RC (if we are hav
>>> On 25.05.17 at 20:00, wrote:
> On 05/25/2017 01:46 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>> On 25/05/17 18:08, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> Is this:
>>>
>>> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-05/msg02340.html
>>>
>>>
>>> being deferred to the next RC (if we are having one)?
>>
>> I mis
On 05/25/2017 01:46 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> On 25/05/17 18:08, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 05/25/2017 11:54 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The patches fixing the 2 outstanding regressions have been merged.
>>
>> Is this:
>>
>> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen
Hi Boris,
On 25/05/17 18:08, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 05/25/2017 11:54 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
The patches fixing the 2 outstanding regressions have been merged.
Is this:
https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-05/msg02340.html
being deferred to the next RC (if we ar
On 05/25/2017 11:54 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The patches fixing the 2 outstanding regressions have been merged.
Is this:
https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-05/msg02340.html
being deferred to the next RC (if we are having one)?
-boris
>
> I would like to make ano
Hi,
The patches fixing the 2 outstanding regressions have been merged.
I would like to make another attempt to branch with the RC (4.9 RC7). I
don't want to branch when master != staging, so please avoid committing
new patches to staging now to let master catch up with staging. Another
announ
Hi all,
We haven't branch due to some regressions found during the week-end.
Meanwhile an RC has been cut and staging has been re-opened.
Please CC me on any patch going to Xen 4.9.
Cheers,
staging is now re-opened. We haven't branch due to some
On 19/05/17 15:56, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi all
Hi all,
Xen tree is going to branch at 4.9 RC6. I don't want to branch when
master != staging, so please avoid committing new patches to staging now
to let master catch up with staging. Another announcement will be made
when the moratorium is lifted.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
___
Julien Grall writes ("Commit moratorium to staging"):
> It looks like osstest is a bit behind because of ARM64 boxes (they are
> fully loaded) and XP testing (they now have been removed see [1]).
>
> I'd like to cut the next rc when staging == master, so please stop
> committing today.
I force
Committers,
It looks like osstest is a bit behind because of ARM64 boxes (they are
fully loaded) and XP testing (they now have been removed see [1]).
I'd like to cut the next rc when staging == master, so please stop
committing today.
Ian forced pushed osstest today, so hopefully we can get
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:55:39PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes ("Commit moratorium for branching 4.7"):
> > At Wei's request, I am starting to branch the tree, so that
> > xen-unstable can diverge from the *-4.7 preparation branches.
> >
> > Please don't commit anything until I'
George Dunlap writes ("Re: Commit moratorium for branching 4.7"):
> On 07/06/16 15:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > Perhaps we can use the same model as I think we used last time,
> > with the person committing to unstable being responsible to also
> > put things applicable to 4.7 there? And with that de
On 07/06/16 15:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.06.16 at 15:55, wrote:
>> Ian Jackson writes ("Commit moratorium for branching 4.7"):
>>> At Wei's request, I am starting to branch the tree, so that
>>> xen-unstable can diverge from the *-4.7 preparation branches.
>>>
>>> Please don't commit anyth
>>> On 07.06.16 at 15:55, wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes ("Commit moratorium for branching 4.7"):
>> At Wei's request, I am starting to branch the tree, so that
>> xen-unstable can diverge from the *-4.7 preparation branches.
>>
>> Please don't commit anything until I'm done, which will be later
>>
Ian Jackson writes ("Commit moratorium for branching 4.7"):
> At Wei's request, I am starting to branch the tree, so that
> xen-unstable can diverge from the *-4.7 preparation branches.
>
> Please don't commit anything until I'm done, which will be later
> today.
I have now finished this branchin
Committers,
All patches that I'm aware of that need to be in 4.6 have been
committed. Please stop committing to staging-4.6 today.
Next week we will start making release when OSSTest gets a push.
Wei.
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.or
Committers,
RC4 is tagged. You can now commit rest of your 4.6 queue to staging-4.6.
Note that we expect to release in about two weeks (Oct 12). Preferably
all patches should be applied within this week so that we can sort out
any problem within next week.
Wei.
_
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 04:37:14PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Wei,
>
> It seems like rc4 is about due, but you are away.
>
> So in anticipation of you getting back and wanting to cut rc4 ASAP we
> discussed on IRC and decided to institute a commit moratorium from ~now so
> that on Monday when y
Wei,
It seems like rc4 is about due, but you are away.
So in anticipation of you getting back and wanting to cut rc4 ASAP we
discussed on IRC and decided to institute a commit moratorium from ~now so
that on Monday when you get back stable-4.6 == staging-4.6 (hopefully!) and
you can either call i
On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 11:01 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 05:25:17PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > Committers,
> >
> > Xen tree is going to branch at 4.6 RC3. I don't want to branch when
> > master != staging, so please avoid committing new patches to staging
> > now
> > to let mast
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 05:25:17PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> Committers,
>
> Xen tree is going to branch at 4.6 RC3. I don't want to branch when
> master != staging, so please avoid committing new patches to staging now
> to let master catch up with staging. Another announcement will be made
> when
On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 14:19 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:56:20PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 13:12 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > >
> > > But this point is moot since I said in the other email I was happy
> > > with
> > > that one-liner applied today.
> >
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:56:20PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 13:12 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> >
> > But this point is moot since I said in the other email I was happy with
> > that one-liner applied today.
>
> I will do so.
>
> If we are having a push to staging anyway then
On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 13:12 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
>
> But this point is moot since I said in the other email I was happy with
> that one-liner applied today.
I will do so.
If we are having a push to staging anyway then I also have these candidates
in my folder:
tools/xen-access: use PRI_xen
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 06:08:18AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 04.09.15 at 13:52, wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:44:24AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 03.09.15 at 18:25, wrote:
> >> > Xen tree is going to branch at 4.6 RC3. I don't want to branch when
> >> > master != stagin
>>> On 04.09.15 at 13:52, wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:44:24AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 03.09.15 at 18:25, wrote:
>> > Xen tree is going to branch at 4.6 RC3. I don't want to branch when
>> > master != staging, so please avoid committing new patches to staging now
>> > to let ma
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:44:24AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 03.09.15 at 18:25, wrote:
> > Xen tree is going to branch at 4.6 RC3. I don't want to branch when
> > master != staging, so please avoid committing new patches to staging now
> > to let master catch up with staging. Another anno
>>> On 03.09.15 at 18:25, wrote:
> Xen tree is going to branch at 4.6 RC3. I don't want to branch when
> master != staging, so please avoid committing new patches to staging now
> to let master catch up with staging. Another announcement will be made
> when the moratorium is lifted.
Hmm, I think
Committers,
Xen tree is going to branch at 4.6 RC3. I don't want to branch when
master != staging, so please avoid committing new patches to staging now
to let master catch up with staging. Another announcement will be made
when the moratorium is lifted.
Thanks
Wei.
_
Ian Jackson writes ("Commit moratorium for 4.6rc1"):
> Please avoid committing anything just now. We need the push gate
> clear for a patch to update the tools library sonames, which is needed
> for rc1.
staging is now open for committing again. But, note that Wei (with RM
hat on) has asked that
Please avoid committing anything just now. We need the push gate
clear for a patch to update the tools library sonames, which is needed
for rc1.
Thanks,
Ian.
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
58 matches
Mail list logo
