On Jan 12, 5:25pm, Daniel De Graaf wrote:
} Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Architecture for dom0 integrity measurements.
Hi Daniel, thanks for taking time to respond. Hope your week is going
well.
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org
> >
hitecture for dom0 integrity measurements.
>
> On Jan 12, 3:53pm, "Xu, Quan" wrote:
> } Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Architecture for dom0 integrity measurements.
>
> > Hi, Dr. G.W. Wettstein
>
> Hi Quan, thanks for taking the time to reply.
>
> &g
On Jan 12, 3:53pm, "Xu, Quan" wrote:
} Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Architecture for dom0 integrity measurements.
> Hi, Dr. G.W. Wettstein
Hi Quan, thanks for taking the time to reply.
> cc Graaf who is vTPM / XSM maintainer.
> Also cc Stefano.
Greetings to ev
:59 PM
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: [Xen-devel] Architecture for dom0 integrity measurements.
Hi, I hope the weekend is going well for everyone.
We have been watching the discussions on the list over the holiday on the
refinement and enhancement of the TPM architecture for Xen, including
; To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> Subject: [Xen-devel] Architecture for dom0 integrity measurements.
>
> Hi, I hope the weekend is going well for everyone.
>
> We have been watching the discussions on the list over the holiday on the
> refinement and enhancement of the TPM architecture for Xen
Hi, I hope the weekend is going well for everyone.
We have been watching the discussions on the list over the holiday on
the refinement and enhancement of the TPM architecture for Xen,
including support for TPM 2.0. We are active in measured platform
development and I wanted to pose what is perha
