Re: [Xen-devel] [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED

2016-09-19 Thread Ian Jackson
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED"): > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 02:51:03PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > > ... depends on the security support status of that particular > > feature. > > To enable it you had to provide th

Re: [Xen-devel] [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED

2016-09-19 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 02:51:03PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 02:46:11PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED"): > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:56:01AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: &g

Re: [Xen-devel] [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED

2016-09-19 Thread Wei Liu
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 02:46:11PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED"): > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:56:01AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > I guess the respective command line option ("all

Re: [Xen-devel] [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED

2016-09-19 Thread Ian Jackson
Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED"): > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:56:01AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > I guess the respective command line option ("allowsuperpage") was > > not given? > > Correct, that option is not gi

Re: [Xen-devel] [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED

2016-09-19 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:42:05AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:37:30AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > osstest service owner writes ("[xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED"): > > > flight 100874 xtf real [real] > > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/100874/ > > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED

2016-09-19 Thread Wei Liu
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:56:01AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 19.09.16 at 12:42, wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:37:30AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > >> The log says: > >>PV superpage support not detected > >> > >> I assume this is not a missing hardware feature, but rather a mis

Re: [Xen-devel] [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED

2016-09-19 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 19.09.16 at 12:42, wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:37:30AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: >> The log says: >>PV superpage support not detected >> >> I assume this is not a missing hardware feature, but rather a missing >> build option or something ? >> >> https://wiki.xenproject.org/wi

Re: [Xen-devel] [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED

2016-09-19 Thread Wei Liu
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:37:30AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > osstest service owner writes ("[xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED"): > > flight 100874 xtf real [real] > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/100874/ > > > > Perfect :-) > > Hooray. I see this is running in xen-unstab

Re: [Xen-devel] [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED

2016-09-19 Thread Ian Jackson
osstest service owner writes ("[xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED"): > flight 100874 xtf real [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/100874/ > > Perfect :-) Hooray. I see this is running in xen-unstable now, as expected. Just to check, are we expecting `xtf/test-pv64-xsa-16

[Xen-devel] [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED

2016-09-10 Thread osstest service owner
flight 100874 xtf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/100874/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: xtf b5c5332de4268d33a6f8eadc1d17c7b9cf0e7dc3 baseline version: xtf 97541e1fde20b6823fa146