On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 09:46 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [xen-unstable test] 79027: regressions -
> FAIL"):
> ...
> > Given the status of the rumpkernel push gate (needs significant
> > reworking in osstest to match upstream developments, gate is currently
> > disabled) I t
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [xen-unstable test] 79027: regressions - FAIL"):
...
> Given the status of the rumpkernel push gate (needs significant
> reworking in osstest to match upstream developments, gate is currently
> disabled) I think we should just force push this.
I agree.
Ian.
On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 18:18 +, osstest service owner wrote:
> flight 79027 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/79027/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> build-amd64-rumpuser
flight 79027 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/79027/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-rumpuserxen 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 78610
build-i386-rumpuserx
