On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 12:04 +0800, Robert Hu wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 10:29 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 08:06 +, Hu, Robert wrote:
> > > >
> > > [...]
> >
> > Please trim your quotes.
> >
> > > For your failure, as Kevin mentioned in other mail, we will find
>
On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 10:29 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 08:06 +, Hu, Robert wrote:
> > >
> > [...]
>
> Please trim your quotes.
>
> > For your failure, as Kevin mentioned in other mail, we will find someone
> > to look into.
> > Would you find out the detailed log of '
On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 08:35 +, Jin, Gordon wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Robert Hu [mailto:robert...@vmm.sh.intel.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 2:27 PM
> > To: Ian Campbell
> > Cc: Hu, Robert; Ian Jackson; Nakajima, Jun; Tian, Kevin;
> > xen-de...@lists.xensource
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Hu [mailto:robert...@vmm.sh.intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 2:27 PM
> To: Ian Campbell
> Cc: Hu, Robert; Ian Jackson; Nakajima, Jun; Tian, Kevin;
> xen-de...@lists.xensource.com; osstest service owner; Jan Beulich; Andrew
> Cooper; Wang, Y
On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 10:29 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 08:06 +, Hu, Robert wrote:
> > >
> > [...]
>
> Please trim your quotes.
>
> > For your failure, as Kevin mentioned in other mail, we will find someone
> > to look into.
> > Would you find out the detailed log of '
On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 08:06 +, Hu, Robert wrote:
> >
> [...]
Please trim your quotes.
> For your failure, as Kevin mentioned in other mail, we will find someone
> to look into.
> Would you find out the detailed log of ' debian-hvm-install--l1--l2'
> step? so that he
> can start analyze, as I
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Saturday, December 5, 2015 4:10 PM
> To: Hu, Robert ; Ian Jackson
> ; Nakajima, Jun ;
> Tian, Kevin
> Cc: xen-de...@lists.xensource.com; osstest service owner
> ; Jan Beulich ;
> Andrew Cooper
> Subject: R
>>> On 08.12.15 at 03:46, wrote:
> I didn't see an obvious error from the commit, so some debug
> would be required to identify the problematic code. However this
> issue was not reproduced immediately in our internal environment,
> and the guy familiar with this area (Yang) just left Intel. It
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 12:18 AM
>
> >>> On 05.12.15 at 09:09, wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 13:51 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >
> >> http://osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org/~osstest/pub/logs/65301/
> >>
> >> I think that ought to give
>>> On 07.12.15 at 17:28, wrote:
> One approach to fixing might be to disentangle the various things which
> this patch did, such that the actual culprit is a smaller thing to analyse.
Yes, if we're going to revert, I'll try to do something in that direction.
I don't expect there to be too much r
On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 09:18 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 05.12.15 at 09:09, wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 13:51 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >
> > > http://osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org/~osstest/pub/logs/65301/
> > >
> > > I think that ought to give a baseline for the bisector to w
>>> On 05.12.15 at 09:09, wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 13:51 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
>> http://osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org/~osstest/pub/logs/65301/
>>
>> I think that ought to give a baseline for the bisector to work with. I'll
>> prod it to do so.
>
> Results are below. TL;DR: d02e
On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 13:51 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> http://osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org/~osstest/pub/logs/65301/
>
> I think that ought to give a baseline for the bisector to work with. I'll
> prod it to do so.
Results are below. TL;DR: d02e84b9d9d "vVMX: use latched VMCS machine
address
On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 05:58 +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 9:51 PM
> > >
> > > According to
> > > http://osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org/~osstest/pub/results/bisect/xe
> > > n-un
> > > stable/test-amd64-amd64
> From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 9:51 PM
> >
> > According to
> > http://osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org/~osstest/pub/results/bisect/xen-un
> > stable/test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel.debian-hvm-install--l1
> > --l2.html
> > it was unable
On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 10:34 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
[...]
> FWIW looking at the different branches in
>
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel/
>
> While xen-unstable has started failing on godello1 xen-4.6-testing does
> seem to b
On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 03:52 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 02.12.15 at 11:34, wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 05:35 +, Hu, Robert wrote:
> >
> > Also adding Vt-x maintainers (Kevin and Jun) for their help/input, I'm
> > not
> > sure if there is a dedicated nested-vmx maintainer. This f
On 02/12/15 10:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.12.15 at 11:34, wrote:
>> On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 05:35 +, Hu, Robert wrote:
>>
>> Also adding Vt-x maintainers (Kevin and Jun) for their help/input, I'm not
>> sure if there is a dedicated nested-vmx maintainer. This failure has been
>> blocking
>>> On 02.12.15 at 11:34, wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 05:35 +, Hu, Robert wrote:
>
> Also adding Vt-x maintainers (Kevin and Jun) for their help/input, I'm not
> sure if there is a dedicated nested-vmx maintainer. This failure has been
> blocking the xen-unstable push gate for a week now s
On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 05:35 +, Hu, Robert wrote:
Also adding Vt-x maintainers (Kevin and Jun) for their help/input, I'm not
sure if there is a dedicated nested-vmx maintainer. This failure has been
blocking the xen-unstable push gate for a week now so it really does need
looking into.
Also CC
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Jackson [mailto:ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 11:54 PM
> To: Hu, Robert
> Cc: xen-de...@lists.xensource.com; osstest service owner
>
> Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 65141: regressions - FAIL
>
> osstest service owner writ
osstest service owner writes ("[xen-unstable test] 65141: regressions - FAIL"):
> flight 65141 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65141/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> test
flight 65141 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65141/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel 16 debian-hvm-install/l1/l2 fail REGR. vs.
65114
Regressions w
23 matches
Mail list logo
