Hi,
On 02/06/2015 06:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.05.15 at 18:32, wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 17:04 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
Looking at the netback side though it seems like netback_remove is
switching to state=Closed _before_ it calls kobject_uevent(...,
KOBJ_OFFLINE) and it is this which
>>> On 29.05.15 at 18:32, wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 17:04 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> Looking at the netback side though it seems like netback_remove is
>> switching to state=Closed _before_ it calls kobject_uevent(...,
>> KOBJ_OFFLINE) and it is this which generates the call to netback_uev
On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 17:04 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Looking at the netback side though it seems like netback_remove is
> switching to state=Closed _before_ it calls kobject_uevent(...,
> KOBJ_OFFLINE) and it is this which generates the call to netback_uevent
> which tries and fails to read scr
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 10:56 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 28/05/15 11:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 28.05.15 at 11:26, wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 09:50 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 27.05.15 at 18:04, wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 14:29 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
>>> On 29.05.15 at 11:56, wrote:
> On 28/05/15 11:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 28.05.15 at 11:26, wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 09:50 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 27.05.15 at 18:04, wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 14:29 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> I've now managed to repro
On 28/05/15 11:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 28.05.15 at 11:26, wrote:
>> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 09:50 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 27.05.15 at 18:04, wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 14:29 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> I've now managed to reproduce using the arndale on my desk.
.
>>> On 28.05.15 at 11:26, wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 09:50 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 27.05.15 at 18:04, wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 14:29 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> >> I've now managed to reproduce using the arndale on my desk.
>> >
>> > ... and now I've confirmed that rev
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 09:50 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 27.05.15 at 18:04, wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 14:29 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 10:56 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 09:34 +, osstest service user wrote:
> >> > > flight 5675
>>> On 27.05.15 at 18:04, wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 14:29 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 10:56 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 09:34 +, osstest service user wrote:
>> > > flight 56759 xen-unstable real [real]
>> > > http://logs.test-lab.xenprojec
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 14:29 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 10:56 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 09:34 +, osstest service user wrote:
> > > flight 56759 xen-unstable real [real]
> > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/56759/
> > >
> > > R
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 10:56 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 09:34 +, osstest service user wrote:
> > flight 56759 xen-unstable real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/56759/
> >
> > Regressions :-(
> >
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blockin
Hi Ian,
On 26/05/2015 11:17, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 11:11 +0200, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 20/05/2015 11:56, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 09:34 +, osstest service user wrote:
flight 56759 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstes
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 11:11 +0200, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 20/05/2015 11:56, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 09:34 +, osstest service user wrote:
> >> flight 56759 xen-unstable real [real]
> >> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/56759/
> >>
> >> Regressions
Hi,
On 20/05/2015 11:56, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 09:34 +, osstest service user wrote:
flight 56759 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/56759/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could n
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 09:34 +, osstest service user wrote:
> flight 56759 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/56759/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-m
flight 56759 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/56759/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 17 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 56375
Regressions which ar
16 matches
Mail list logo
