>>> Andrew Cooper 10/16/17 6:39 PM >>>
>On 16/10/17 17:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 16.10.17 at 11:14, wrote:
>>> Jan: This highlights that TSX/VMEntry failure fixes probably want
>>> backporting to before Xen 4.9. IIRC, the 6 patches needed are:
>> So I'm mildly confused by this request:
>>
On 16/10/17 16:16, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.8-testing test] 114505:
> regressions - FAIL"):
>> On 15/10/17 20:45, osstest service owner wrote:
>>> flight 114505 xen-4.8-testing real [real]
>>> http://logs.tes
On 16/10/17 17:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 16.10.17 at 11:14, wrote:
>> On 15/10/17 20:45, osstest service owner wrote:
>>> flight 114505 xen-4.8-testing real [real]
>>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114505/
>>>
>>> Regressions :-(
>>>
>>> Tests which did not succeed and are
>>> On 16.10.17 at 11:14, wrote:
> On 15/10/17 20:45, osstest service owner wrote:
>> flight 114505 xen-4.8-testing real [real]
>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114505/
>>
>> Regressions :-(
>>
>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> including tests which could not
Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.8-testing test] 114505:
regressions - FAIL"):
> On 15/10/17 20:45, osstest service owner wrote:
> > flight 114505 xen-4.8-testing real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114505/
> >
> > Re
On 15/10/17 20:45, osstest service owner wrote:
> flight 114505 xen-4.8-testing real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114505/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 48 xtf/tes
flight 114505 xen-4.8-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114505/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 48 xtf/test-hvm64-lbr-tsx-vmentry fail REGR. vs. 114173
Tests which are