Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 62015: regressions
- FAIL"):
> This has failed twice in a row on xen-4.6-testing, in 61839 and here. The
> bisector already had a go at the initial failure, but concluded
> unreproducible as shown by the yell
On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 13:40 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 06:44:05AM +, osstest service owner wrote:
> > flight 62015 xen-4.6-testing real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62015/
> >
> > Regressions :-(
> >
> > Tests which did not succeed and are b
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 06:44:05AM +, osstest service owner wrote:
> flight 62015 xen-4.6-testing real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62015/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> test-amd64
flight 62015 xen-4.6-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62015/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-install fail
REGR. vs. 61745
