Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 101679: regressions
- FAIL"):
> Aren't these the failures you alluded to in an earlier mail would need
> force pushing? If so, same for 4.7 flight 101683?
Indeed they are.
Ian.
osstest service owner writes ("[xen-4.6-testing test] 101679: regressions -
FAIL"):
> flight 101679 xen-4.6-testing real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/101679/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be ru
>>> On 27.10.16 at 03:27, wrote:
> flight 101679 xen-4.6-testing real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/101679/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 13 saverestore-
flight 101679 xen-4.6-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/101679/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 13 saverestore-support-check fail REGR. vs. 101257
test-armhf-arm
