On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 04:21 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Agreed, I think we should force push here.
After discussion IRL and on IRC Ian was OK with this too.
>From the original report:
> version targeted for testing:
> xen 4d99a76cfeba6d23504121a51e7750f230128d85
> baseline vers
>>> On 05.10.15 at 11:29, wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-10-04 at 17:46 +, osstest service owner wrote:
>> flight 62616 xen-4.4-testing real [real]
>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62616/
>>
>> Regressions :-(
>>
>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> including tests
On Sun, 2015-10-04 at 17:46 +, osstest service owner wrote:
> flight 62616 xen-4.4-testing real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62616/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> test-amd64-i386-x
flight 62616 xen-4.4-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62616/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail in 62389
REGR. vs. 60727
Tes