On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 16:50 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > And with that - will it ever clear?
>
> Not unless we get lucky and that guest-stop passes.
The guest-stop is (now) an allowable fail. After discussing this with
Ian f2f it seems that he underlying issue is that the allowable-ness
check is
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.2-testing test] 58817: FAIL"):
> >>> On 22.06.15 at 08:54, wrote:
> > flight 58817 xen-4.2-testing real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/58817/
> >
> > Failures and proble
>>> On 22.06.15 at 08:54, wrote:
> flight 58817 xen-4.2-testing real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/58817/
>
> Failures and problems with tests :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> build-amd64-libvirt
flight 58817 xen-4.2-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/58817/
Failures and problems with tests :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-libvirt 3 host-install(3) broken in 58584 REGR. vs. 584
