On 16-10-10 01:34:47, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 09.10.16 at 08:43, wrote:
> > On 16-09-30 17:18:33, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:15:20AM +0800, Yi Sun wrote:
> >> > Current psr.c is designed for supporting L3 CAT/CDP. It has many
> >> > limitations to add new feat
>>> On 09.10.16 at 08:43, wrote:
> On 16-09-30 17:18:33, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:15:20AM +0800, Yi Sun wrote:
>> > Current psr.c is designed for supporting L3 CAT/CDP. It has many
>> > limitations to add new feature. Considering to support more PSR
>> > features,
Thanks for reviewing the patches! Sorry for late to reply because Oct 1 to 7
is China National Holiday.
On 16-09-30 17:18:33, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:15:20AM +0800, Yi Sun wrote:
> > Current psr.c is designed for supporting L3 CAT/CDP. It has many
> > limitations
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:15:20AM +0800, Yi Sun wrote:
> Current psr.c is designed for supporting L3 CAT/CDP. It has many
> limitations to add new feature. Considering to support more PSR
> features, we need refactor PSR implementation to make it more
> flexible and fulfill the principle, open for
Current psr.c is designed for supporting L3 CAT/CDP. It has many
limitations to add new feature. Considering to support more PSR
features, we need refactor PSR implementation to make it more
flexible and fulfill the principle, open for extension but closed
for modification.
The core of the refacto
