Re: [Xen-devel] [rumpuserxen test] 33416: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages]

2015-01-16 Thread Antti Kantee
On 16/01/15 11:17, Ian Jackson wrote: The latter is the GPF turning out to be unreproducible. I guess we should keep an eye out in case it turns out to be a race rather than a cosmic ray. I do not believe in cosmic rays. Some notes in case it resurfaces: 1) the topmost caller address appears

Re: [Xen-devel] [rumpuserxen test] 33416: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages]

2015-01-16 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [rumpuserxen test] 33416: regressions - FAIL"): ... > I can't easily rerun it by hand, but the cron job is rerunning it > already. Also our automatic bisector is working on it. xen.org writes ("[rumpuserxen test] 33434: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED"): > flight 334