Re: [Xen-devel] [rumpuserxen test] 31509: regressions - FAIL

2014-11-13 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [rumpuserxen test] 31509: regressions - FAIL"): ... > This is weird. Actually, I think, the problem is that the rumpkernel now exits successfully rather than crashing, and my domain config file says only `on_crash="preserve"' and not `on_shutdown="preserve"'. So this is a

Re: [Xen-devel] [rumpuserxen test] 31509: regressions - FAIL

2014-11-13 Thread Ian Jackson
xen.org writes ("[rumpuserxen test] 31509: regressions - FAIL"): > flight 31509 rumpuserxen real [real] > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31509/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > including tests which could not be run: > test-amd64-i386-rump

[Xen-devel] [rumpuserxen test] 31509: regressions - FAIL

2014-11-12 Thread xen . org
flight 31509 rumpuserxen real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31509/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 11 rumpuserxen-demo-xenstorels/xenstorels fail REGR. vs. 31437 tes