>>> On 19.05.17 at 12:56, wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 109469: regressions -
> FAIL"):
>> Therefore I'm afraid the only way we could obtain a more
>> complete picture would be if this re-occurred and if at that
>
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 109469: regressions -
FAIL"):
> Therefore I'm afraid the only way we could obtain a more
> complete picture would be if this re-occurred and if at that
> time we'd have "async-show-all" in place on th
>>> On 17.05.17 at 16:59, wrote:
> On 05/16/2017 06:43 PM, osstest service owner wrote:
>> flight 109469 linux-linus real [real]
>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/109469/
>>
>> Regressions :-(
>>
>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> including tests which could not
On 05/16/2017 06:43 PM, osstest service owner wrote:
> flight 109469 linux-linus real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/109469/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt 6
flight 109469 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/109469/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-libvirt 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 109449
test-arm64-arm64-xl
