Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 63030: regressions -
FAIL"):
> FWIW I believe the source dom0's ARP entry will be dropped when the VIF
> device is destroyed.
...
> For Linux bridging I believe it happens at the latest when the vif device
> is dele
On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 15:41 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 63030: regressions
> - FAIL"):
> > On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 12:03 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > No, vif-bridge script has two runes for off-lining a vif
&
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 63030: regressions -
FAIL"):
> On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 12:03 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > No, vif-bridge script has two runes for off-lining a vif
> > brctl delif $bridge $vif
> > ifconfig $vif down
> >
&g
at 18:34 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 05:47:06PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 16:34 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > > > > > Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 63030:
>
05:47:06PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 16:34 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > > > > Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 63030:
> > > > > > regressions
> > > > > > - FAIL"):
16:34 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > > > Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 63030:
> > > > > regressions
> > > > > - FAIL"):
> > > > > > From mere code inspection and document of lwip 1.3.0 I think
> >
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:50:54AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 18:34 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 05:47:06PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 16:34 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > > Wei Liu writes (&q
On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 18:34 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 05:47:06PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 16:34 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 63030: regressions
> > > - FAIL"
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 05:47:06PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 16:34 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 63030: regressions
> > - FAIL"):
> > > From mere code inspection and document of lwip 1.3
On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 16:34 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 63030: regressions
> - FAIL"):
> > From mere code inspection and document of lwip 1.3.0 I think mini
> -os
> > does send gratuitous ARP.
>
> The gue
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:48:24AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 11:35 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:44:48AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 10:24 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:04:14AM +0100, Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 11:35 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:44:48AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 10:24 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:04:14AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 16:24 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > >
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:44:48AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 10:24 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:04:14AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 16:24 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > > But this is only code inspection, so I'm not very conf
On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 10:44 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Found your patch posted in 2011.
> >
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/82813/
> >
> > I think you're right and the said behaviour exists in Wheezy's 3.2
> > kernel.
>
> This ended up as d11327ad6695db8117c78d70611e71102ceec2ac and:
On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 10:24 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:04:14AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 16:24 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > But this is only code inspection, so I'm not very confident whether
> > > everything does what it says it does.
> >
> > Rig
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:04:14AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 16:24 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > But this is only code inspection, so I'm not very confident whether
> > everything does what it says it does.
>
> Right,. I think this one probably needs someone to setup a system
On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 16:24 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> But this is only code inspection, so I'm not very confident whether
> everything does what it says it does.
Right,. I think this one probably needs someone to setup a system in a
similar configuration and play with it.
xen-netfront.c calls netd
Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 63030: regressions - FAIL"):
> From mere code inspection and document of lwip 1.3.0 I think mini-os
> does send gratuitous ARP.
The guest is using the PVHVM drivers at this point, with the backend
directly in dom0, so it is the gu
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 03:39:26PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 63030: regressions - FAIL"):
> > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 05:52:32PM +, osstest service owner wrote:
> ...
> > > Tests which did not succeed and are
Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 63030: regressions - FAIL"):
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 05:52:32PM +, osstest service owner wrote:
...
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> > test-amd64-
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 05:52:32PM +, osstest service owner wrote:
> flight 63030 linux-4.1 real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/63030/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> test-amd64-i386-
flight 63030 linux-4.1 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/63030/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 15 guest-localmigrate.2
fail REGR. vs. 62318
Tes
22 matches
Mail list logo
