Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v2 3/7] xen/passthrough/arm: Introduce iommu_fwspec

2017-10-19 Thread Goel, Sameer
On 10/12/2017 7:05 AM, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi, > > On 21/09/17 01:37, Sameer Goel wrote: >> Introduce a common structure to hold the fw (ACPI or DT) defined >> configuration for SMMU hw. The current use case is for arm SMMUs. So, >> making this architecture specific. >> >> Based on Linux kerne

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v2 3/7] xen/passthrough/arm: Introduce iommu_fwspec

2017-10-12 Thread Julien Grall
Hi, On 12/10/17 14:05, Julien Grall wrote: Hi, On 21/09/17 01:37, Sameer Goel wrote: Introduce a common structure to hold the fw (ACPI or DT) defined configuration for SMMU hw. The current use case is for arm SMMUs. So, making this architecture specific. Based on Linux kernel commit 57f98d2f6

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v2 3/7] xen/passthrough/arm: Introduce iommu_fwspec

2017-10-12 Thread Julien Grall
Hi, On 21/09/17 01:37, Sameer Goel wrote: Introduce a common structure to hold the fw (ACPI or DT) defined configuration for SMMU hw. The current use case is for arm SMMUs. So, making this architecture specific. Based on Linux kernel commit 57f98d2f61e1: iommu: Introduce iommu_fwspec Signed-off

[Xen-devel] [RFC v2 3/7] xen/passthrough/arm: Introduce iommu_fwspec

2017-09-20 Thread Sameer Goel
Introduce a common structure to hold the fw (ACPI or DT) defined configuration for SMMU hw. The current use case is for arm SMMUs. So, making this architecture specific. Based on Linux kernel commit 57f98d2f61e1: iommu: Introduce iommu_fwspec Signed-off-by: Sameer Goel --- xen/drivers/passthroug