On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 02:22:34PM +, Wei Liu wrote:
> So if nobody objects to this move I will try to clean this series up and
> teach OSSTest to use the new tree.
>
Surprisingly this version works almost out-of-box for me. I've added
more documents to construct various v2 branches.
In the
So if nobody objects to this move I will try to clean this series up and
teach OSSTest to use the new tree.
Hopefully I will get everything in shape and this series can be merged
once next development window opens.
Wei.
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-d
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 01:20:37AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Wei Liu, on Thu 10 Mar 2016 16:46:39 +, wrote:
> > 1. There are some open questions -- see individual commits.
>
> Not sure I have seen them all, but here are some bits of answers:
>
> - Not sure what the version n
Hello,
Wei Liu, on Thu 10 Mar 2016 16:46:39 +, wrote:
> 1. There are some open questions -- see individual commits.
Not sure I have seen them all, but here are some bits of answers:
- Not sure what the version number of stubdom.git should be.
Indeed. I don't really have an opinion on this,
Hi all
This is a very RFC seris for splitting off stubdom from xen.git.
It's RFC because:
1. There are some open questions -- see individual commits.
2. I haven't tested it, everything should compile though.
3. I'm not entirely sure about the arrangement between toolstack and
stubdom is corre
