Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH V2 6/8] xen/vm_event: Decouple vm_event and mem_access.

2015-01-22 Thread Tamas K Lengyel
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Tim Deegan wrote: > At 16:17 +0100 on 18 Jan (1421594279), Tamas K Lengyel wrote: >> The vm_event subsystem has been artifically tied to the presence of >> mem_access. >> While mem_access does depend on vm_event, vm_event is an entirely independent >> subsystem th

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH V2 6/8] xen/vm_event: Decouple vm_event and mem_access.

2015-01-22 Thread Tim Deegan
At 16:17 +0100 on 18 Jan (1421594279), Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > The vm_event subsystem has been artifically tied to the presence of > mem_access. > While mem_access does depend on vm_event, vm_event is an entirely independent > subsystem that can be used for arbitrary function-offloading to helper

[Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH V2 6/8] xen/vm_event: Decouple vm_event and mem_access.

2015-01-18 Thread Tamas K Lengyel
The vm_event subsystem has been artifically tied to the presence of mem_access. While mem_access does depend on vm_event, vm_event is an entirely independent subsystem that can be used for arbitrary function-offloading to helper apps in domains. This patch removes the dependency that mem_access nee