g] On Behalf Of
>>>>>>> Chao Gao
>>>>>>> Sent: 29 March 2017 01:40
>>>>>>> To: Wei Liu
>>>>>>> Cc: Lan Tianyu ; Kevin Tian
>>>>>>> ;
>>>>>>> Ian Jackson ; xen-devel@lists.xen.org
gt; Sent: 29 March 2017 01:40
> >>>>> To: Wei Liu
> >>>>> Cc: Lan Tianyu ; Kevin Tian
> >>>>> ;
> >>>>> Ian Jackson ; xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> >>>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 5/23] Tools/libxc: Add viom
On 2017年04月18日 22:15, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> -Original Message-
> [snip]
>>> > >
>>> > > Not quite sure I understand this. The QEMu device model does not 'pass
>> > DMA requests' as such, it maps guest RAM and reads or writes to emulate
>> > DMA, right? So, what's needed is a mechanism to m
> -Original Message-
[snip]
> >
> > Not quite sure I understand this. The QEMu device model does not 'pass
> DMA requests' as such, it maps guest RAM and reads or writes to emulate
> DMA, right? So, what's needed is a mechanism to map guest RAM by 'bus
> address'... i.e. an address that wil
t; -Original Message-
>>>>> From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf
>> Of
>>>>> Chao Gao
>>>>> Sent: 29 March 2017 01:40
>>>>> To: Wei Liu
>>>>> Cc: Lan Tianyu ; Kevin Tian
>&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Lan, Tianyu [mailto:tianyu@intel.com]
> Sent: 14 April 2017 16:38
> To: Paul Durrant ; Wei Liu ;
> Kevin Tian ; Ian Jackson ;
> xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 5/23] Tools/libxc: Add viommu
> operatio
t wrote:
>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>> From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of
>>>>> Chao Gao
>>>>> Sent: 29 March 2017 01:40
>>>>> To: Wei Liu
>>>>> Cc: Lan Tianyu ; Ke
gt; From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of
> > > > Chao Gao
> > > > Sent: 29 March 2017 01:40
> > > > To: Wei Liu
> > > > Cc: Lan Tianyu ; Kevin Tian
> > > > ;
> > > > Ian Jackson ; xen-devel@l
: Lan Tianyu ; Kevin Tian ;
Ian Jackson ; xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 5/23] Tools/libxc: Add viommu
operations in libxc
Tianyu is on vacation this two weeks, so I will try to address
some comments on this series.
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:24:03PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote
> Ian Jackson ; xen-devel@lists.xen.org
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 5/23] Tools/libxc: Add viommu
>> operations in libxc
>>
>> Tianyu is on vacation this two weeks, so I will try to address
>> some comments on this series.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar
> -Original Message-
> From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of
> Chao Gao
> Sent: 29 March 2017 01:40
> To: Wei Liu
> Cc: Lan Tianyu ; Kevin Tian ;
> Ian Jackson ; xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 5/23]
Tianyu is on vacation this two weeks, so I will try to address
some comments on this series.
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:24:03PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 07:27:05PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
>> From: Chao Gao
>>
>> In previous patch, we introduce a common vIOMMU layer. In our
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 07:27:05PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> From: Chao Gao
>
> In previous patch, we introduce a common vIOMMU layer. In our design,
> we create/destroy vIOMMU through DMOP interface instead of creating it
> according to a config flag of domain. It makes it is possible
> to crea
From: Chao Gao
In previous patch, we introduce a common vIOMMU layer. In our design,
we create/destroy vIOMMU through DMOP interface instead of creating it
according to a config flag of domain. It makes it is possible
to create vIOMMU in device model or in tool stack.
The following toolstack cod
14 matches
Mail list logo
