>>> On 19.09.16 at 07:52, wrote:
> Since vlapic_init() is called before vcpu_initialise().
> We should also follow the same order here.
s/same/inverse/?
Also the ordering issue extends to other calls, and I think if at all
possible we should then do all the teardown in reverse order of
init.
Ja
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:52:42AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> Since vlapic_init() is called before vcpu_initialise().
> We should also follow the same order here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
But it would also be good to CC the Intel VM
Since vlapic_init() is called before vcpu_initialise().
We should also follow the same order here.
Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
index 7bad845
