On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On 03/03/2015 18:07, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > I would like to see a more generic handling of virq != physical irq.
> > This is not specific to LPIs but to any scenario where the physical irq
> > differs from the virtual irq.
>
> I tho
Hi Stefano,
On 03/03/2015 18:07, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
I would like to see a more generic handling of virq != physical irq.
This is not specific to LPIs but to any scenario where the physical irq
differs from the virtual irq.
I though we talked about it during the meeting at Connect...
I'
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015, vijay.kil...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Vijaya Kumar K
>
> Add support for handling ITS(LPI) interrupts.
> The LPI interrupts are handled by physical ITS
> driver.
>
> nested LPI interrupt handling is not tested and
> enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vijaya Kumar K
> ---
> xen/ar
From: Vijaya Kumar K
Add support for handling ITS(LPI) interrupts.
The LPI interrupts are handled by physical ITS
driver.
nested LPI interrupt handling is not tested and
enabled.
Signed-off-by: Vijaya Kumar K
---
xen/arch/arm/gic-v3-its.c | 31 +++
xen/arch/arm/
