On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 05:07:59PM +, Joao Martins wrote:
[...]
> >
> > How much harder would it be to ref-count inflight grants? Would that
> > simplify or perplex things? I'm just asking, not suggesting you should
> > choose ref-counting over current scheme.
> >
> > In principle I favour si
On 02 Jun 2015, at 16:53, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:24:39AM +, Joao Martins wrote:
>>
>> On 19 May 2015, at 17:23, Wei Liu wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 07:18:27PM +0200, Joao Martins wrote:
Introduces persistent grants for TX path which follows similar code pat
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:24:39AM +, Joao Martins wrote:
>
> On 19 May 2015, at 17:23, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 07:18:27PM +0200, Joao Martins wrote:
> >> Introduces persistent grants for TX path which follows similar code path
> >> as the grant mapping.
> >>
> >> It start
On 19 May 2015, at 17:23, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 07:18:27PM +0200, Joao Martins wrote:
>> Introduces persistent grants for TX path which follows similar code path
>> as the grant mapping.
>>
>> It starts by checking if there's a persistent grant available for header
>> and frag
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 07:18:27PM +0200, Joao Martins wrote:
> Introduces persistent grants for TX path which follows similar code path
> as the grant mapping.
>
> It starts by checking if there's a persistent grant available for header
> and frags grefs and if so setting it in tx_pgrants. If no
Introduces persistent grants for TX path which follows similar code path
as the grant mapping.
It starts by checking if there's a persistent grant available for header
and frags grefs and if so setting it in tx_pgrants. If no persistent grant
is found in the tree for the header it will resort to g
