>>> Wei Liu 06/14/17 7:19 PM >>>
>It has always been the case that different xl processes can manipulate the same
>domain at the same time. This could be problematic.
>
>This series attempts to provide facility for xl to have a per-domain lock. This
>lock should be used whenever xl manipulates an
Wei Liu writes ("[RFC PATCH 0/4] Per-domain locking in xl"):
> It has always been the case that different xl processes can
> manipulate the same domain at the same time. This could be
> problematic.
>
> This series attempts to provide facility for xl to have a per-domain
> lock. This lock should b
It has always been the case that different xl processes can manipulate the same
domain at the same time. This could be problematic.
This series attempts to provide facility for xl to have a per-domain lock. This
lock should be used whenever xl manipulates an existing domain.
The last patch is an