Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] xen/arm: build: add missed dependency for head.S

2016-06-07 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Ian, On 07/06/16 11:03, Ian Jackson wrote: Julien Grall writes ("Re: [RFC] xen/arm: build: add missed dependency for head.S"): On 03/06/16 11:07, Wei Chen wrote: When we update the header files that had been included in head.S. The build system would not re-compile the head.S. Because in t

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] xen/arm: build: add missed dependency for head.S

2016-06-07 Thread Ian Jackson
Julien Grall writes ("Re: [RFC] xen/arm: build: add missed dependency for head.S"): > On 03/06/16 11:07, Wei Chen wrote: > > When we update the header files that had been included in head.S. > > The build system would not re-compile the head.S. Because in the > > build rules, the dependencies are

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] xen/arm: build: add missed dependency for head.S

2016-06-06 Thread Julien Grall
(CC Ian) Hi, On 03/06/16 11:07, Wei Chen wrote: When we update the header files that had been included in head.S. The build system would not re-compile the head.S. Because in the build rules, the dependencies are setting to .*.d (eg. DEPS = .*.d) files in the same folder as Makefile. But head.

[Xen-devel] [RFC] xen/arm: build: add missed dependency for head.S

2016-06-03 Thread Wei Chen
When we update the header files that had been included in head.S. The build system would not re-compile the head.S. Because in the build rules, the dependencies are setting to .*.d (eg. DEPS = .*.d) files in the same folder as Makefile. But head.S is very special, it was used by the Makefile in th