On 10/31/2017 5:03 AM, Goel, Sameer wrote:
On 10/12/2017 3:03 PM, Manish Jaggi wrote:
ACPI/IORT Support in Xen.
--
I had sent out patch series [0] to hide smmu from Dom0 IORT. Extending the scope
and including all that is required to support ACPI/IORT in Xe
Hi Manish,
On 10/31/2017 12:05 PM, Manish Jaggi wrote:
On 10/27/2017 7:35 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
When PCI device passthrough is supported, the PCIRC is itself virtual
(emulated by Xen).
One can have any number of virtual PCIRCÂ and may be virtual SMMUs.
Hence the topology can vary.
I think
On 10/27/2017 7:35 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
Hi,
Hey Andre,
On 25/10/17 09:22, Manish Jaggi wrote:
On 10/23/2017 7:27 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
Hi Manish,
On 12/10/17 22:03, Manish Jaggi wrote:
ACPI/IORT Support in Xen.
--
I had sent out patch series
Hi Sameer,
On 10/30/2017 11:33 PM, Goel, Sameer wrote:
On 10/12/2017 3:03 PM, Manish Jaggi wrote:
5. Parsing of IORT in Xen
--
I think a Linux like approach will solve the following use cases:
1. Identify the SMMU devices and initialize the devices as needed.
2. API fun
On 10/12/2017 3:03 PM, Manish Jaggi wrote:
> ACPI/IORT Support in Xen.
> --
>
> I had sent out patch series [0] to hide smmu from Dom0 IORT. Extending the
> scope
> and including all that is required to support ACPI/IORT in Xen. Presenting
> for review
> first
Hi,
On 25/10/17 09:22, Manish Jaggi wrote:
>
>
> On 10/23/2017 7:27 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> Hi Manish,
>>
>> On 12/10/17 22:03, Manish Jaggi wrote:
>>> ACPI/IORT Support in Xen.
>>> --
>>>
>>> I had sent out patch series [0] to hide smmu from Dom0 IORT. Ext
On 10/23/2017 8:26 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 23/10/17 14:57, Andre Przywara wrote:
On 12/10/17 22:03, Manish Jaggi wrote:
It is proposed that the idrange of PCIRC and ITS group be constant for
domUs.
"constant" is a bit confusing here. Maybe "arbitrary", "from scratch" or
"independent
On 10/23/2017 7:27 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
Hi Manish,
On 12/10/17 22:03, Manish Jaggi wrote:
ACPI/IORT Support in Xen.
--
I had sent out patch series [0] to hide smmu from Dom0 IORT. Extending
the scope
and including all that is required to support ACPI/
Hi,
On 23/10/17 14:57, Andre Przywara wrote:
On 12/10/17 22:03, Manish Jaggi wrote:
It is proposed that the idrange of PCIRC and ITS group be constant for
domUs.
"constant" is a bit confusing here. Maybe "arbitrary", "from scratch" or
"independent from the actual h/w"?
I don't think we shou
Hi Manish,
On 12/10/17 22:03, Manish Jaggi wrote:
> ACPI/IORT Support in Xen.
> --
>
> I had sent out patch series [0] to hide smmu from Dom0 IORT. Extending
> the scope
> and including all that is required to support ACPI/IORT in Xen.
> Presenting for review
>
ACPI/IORT Support in Xen.
--
I had sent out patch series [0] to hide smmu from Dom0 IORT. Extending
the scope
and including all that is required to support ACPI/IORT in Xen.
Presenting for review
first _draft_ of design of ACPI/IORT support in Xen. Not compl
11 matches
Mail list logo
