On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:44:19PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 04:00:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 02.05.16 at 12:16, wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 02:44:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >> Short of getting any feedback on the previous discussion item
> > >
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 04:00:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 02.05.16 at 12:16, wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 02:44:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> Short of getting any feedback on the previous discussion item
> >> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-03/msg00
>>> On 02.05.16 at 12:16, wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 02:44:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Short of getting any feedback on the previous discussion item
>> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-03/msg00571.html
>> here's a formal revert request: Please revert commit 19f
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 02:44:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Short of getting any feedback on the previous discussion item
> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-03/msg00571.html
> here's a formal revert request: Please revert commit 19f6c522a6
> from the staging tree (afaict
Short of getting any feedback on the previous discussion item
http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-03/msg00571.html
here's a formal revert request: Please revert commit 19f6c522a6
from the staging tree (afaict it didn't get mirrored to any of the
stable trees yet), as the change
